|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Legal is ..Reader comment on item: [Paul H. Robinson:] U Penn Prof for Shari'a Submitted by don van (United States), Jul 26, 2004 at 14:45 Interesting how Academia can rationalize the irrational. The idea that an American academic would embrace the notion that Islamic "Law" has parity with the legal system of the West is wrong. The idea that a country is condemned to forever being ruled by the whims of the clerics is also wrong. A law professor constructing a legal islamic framework does little but legitimates a foul and unfair philosophical system. One wonders if Hitler had needed help with the Nazis' "Legal" issues, if the professor would have lent a hand. Under his rationale, the philosophical basis of Law is unimportant.Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". Comment on this item
|
Latest Articles Join Daniel Pipes on a Fact Finding Expedition to Israel, March 2012
For full details click here ADVERTISEMENTS
Most Mailed |
|||||||||||
|
All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © 1968-2012 Daniel Pipes. Email: daniel.pipes@gmail.com You can help support Daniel Pipes' work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum. Daniel J. Pipes |
||||||||||||