| Daniel Pipes Mobile Edition Regular Site |
|
| Home | Articles | Blog | Reviews | Search | |
Submitted by Lars Nielsen (Denmark), Dec 21, 2007 at 06:03
Dear Michael
Thank You to my comments on why it was not Lee Harvey Oswald but the vietnam war, which created the american left wing reluctance to go to war.
Because You are right. The average american and the american soldiers did not want to fight that war, and therefore, JFK skould not have stepped up that war, if he could not convince the american people of its necessity. The same is of course true for president Johnson, but he could not step back without losing face, so he was somewhat trapped by JFK´s illadvised intervention.
Because, if You intervene, You become obliged. Obliged to the peole in South Vietnam, who fought alongside the american forces, and committed to win, because else your enemies may inavoidably think, that You will also give up next time, You meet strong resistance.
And in this respect, the iraqui war resembles the vietnamese war, because You already hear people saying. Let´s give up. Let´s go home. It is not our war, and You also hear of problems with recruiting soldiers, and a president, who has lost his popularity over the war.
But on the other hand, You also hear of internal rivalry between iraqis, which may be exploited to the advantage of the american troops. So maybe U.S. will learn from this, that divide et impera, may be the secret war to siege in a guerilla warfare.
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.
| Title | By | Date |
| he killed him for money case closed (revised) [305 words] | adel elkabany | Sep 17, 2008 08:02 |
| Not just JFK, but also MLK and Bobby K. [267 words] | DrRJP | Dec 18, 2007 13:24 |
| ↔ Idealism Is The Psychosis of Morons [81 words] | Winghunter | Sep 20, 2009 14:44 |
| Oh Good Grief [99 words] | Jon | Dec 14, 2007 12:28 |
| Another post Kennedy assassinations observation [548 words] | Homefront | Dec 13, 2007 07:42 |
| Oswald was a member of the pilgrim left [239 words] | Peter Herz | Dec 7, 2007 09:14 |
| Oswald Killed Kennedy? [10 words] | ploni | Dec 5, 2007 11:30 |
| Two sides of the same coin [442 words] | Sheerahkahn | Nov 26, 2007 18:59 |
| why did Oswald kill Kennedy [68 words] | Robert L. Freedman | Nov 26, 2007 12:47 |
| ↔ Why Oswald killed Kennedy [109 words] | Peter Kauffner | Dec 2, 2007 10:41 |
| Ignoring The Obvious [310 words] | Seamus MacNemi | Nov 25, 2007 18:42 |
| Vietnam not Oswald [171 words] | Lars Nielsen | Nov 25, 2007 12:23 |
| ↔ Death of President Kennedy Emblematic of Those Times-But Points to Greater Tragic Legacy [936 words] | M. Tovey | Nov 26, 2007 15:09 |
| ↔ Vietnam Just Fuel, Not Fire [488 words] | Michael USA, Viet Vet | Dec 5, 2007 21:34 |
| ↔ ⇒ Reply to Michael USA [233 words] | Lars Nielsen | Dec 21, 2007 06:03 |
| Nature vs. Nurture and a desire for votes [369 words] | jennifer solis | Nov 23, 2007 23:10 |
| The Book's Premise is Wrong - the Left has always been anti-American [619 words] | Steve Rogers | Nov 23, 2007 17:26 |
| The Legacy of Abraham Zapruder & Creation of Suicidal Liberalism [527 words] | James Burke,( Canada), CPA (Illinois), | Nov 23, 2007 08:46 |
| Disagree With "Oswald's Malign Legacy Hypothesis" [155 words] | Peter Stevens | Nov 22, 2007 23:13 |
| Also Explains the Mechanism of Denial: "Sixteen Other Assassins..." [94 words] | Karridine | Nov 22, 2007 19:41 |
| The Dead Kennedy's and Liberal regression [212 words] | Luta RD Belcher | Nov 22, 2007 15:04 |
| Oswald's Malign Legacy [113 words] | Tom Quigan | Nov 22, 2007 14:09 |
| tunnel vision [116 words] | David W. Lincoln | Nov 22, 2007 10:43 |
| Oswald's malign legacy? [270 words] | Leon Van Dyke | Nov 22, 2007 09:02 |
| "Liberal" today means illiberal [195 words] | Ian Campbell | Nov 22, 2007 07:30 |
| This is line of reasoning is certainly thought provoking [652 words] | Ken Besig | Nov 22, 2007 04:26 |
| With my own eyes [304 words] | zari namdar | Nov 22, 2007 04:14 |
| ↔ An interesting perspective [130 words] | jennifer solis | Nov 23, 2007 23:50 |
| ↔ I'll Sign On With That [18 words] | Seamus MacNemi | Nov 26, 2007 07:10 |
| ↔ He's a She [33 words] | jennifer solis | Nov 26, 2007 20:29 |
| Nexus not in Kennedy Assasination [353 words] | Stan Kreis | Nov 22, 2007 01:43 |
| Oswald [108 words] | Gunther H. Schiff | Nov 21, 2007 23:54 |
| US Treasury notes [167 words] | mea | Nov 21, 2007 22:47 |
| The Men Who Knew Too Much [268 words] | Rebecca Moulds | Nov 21, 2007 22:38 |
| Liberals are cultural marxists [61 words] | Rodger | Nov 21, 2007 22:31 |
| Lee Harvey Oswald [132 words] | Dannel R. Ballesteros | Nov 21, 2007 21:45 |
| simplistic [306 words] | John W. McGinley | Nov 21, 2007 21:10 |
| National Self-Hatred [186 words] | Paul Eidelberg | Nov 21, 2007 20:53 |
| A clear, concise and very true article... [475 words] | Ayasha | Nov 21, 2007 20:23 |
| ↔ Liberal Drivel and Capitalist Clap Trap [200 words] | Seamus MacNemi | Nov 25, 2007 20:38 |