Submitted by Peter Herz(United States), Dec 7, 2007 at 09:14
The comments that followed the assassination of President Kennedy are exhibit A in any case proving the moral irresponsibility of the left. Lee Harvey Oswald was a former defector to the USSR and an admirer of Castro--a poster child of the pilgrim left; not an epitome of traditional American bigotires.
While not impugning the patriotism of men like FDR and HST, I nonetheless believe they did the country a lot of harm. FDR trained the nation to look to the official handout for relief; and his policies may well have prolonged the depression. His NRA's prosectution of the Schechter brothers (let's hear it for the courts that put a stop to it) was vicious in the extreme. Both FDR and HST trusted Harry Dexter White with the nation's money; yet he was a Soviet dupe to his fingertips.
As for the Kennedy crowd, they went into office thinking that Americans could do everything from abolishing poverty in Appalachia and India to nation-building in Southeast Asia; they left whining that Americans had done everything from teaching corruption to the heirs of a Confucian Mandarinate in Viet Nam to teaching torture to the heirs of the Spanish Inquisition in Latin America.
Yes, Oswald was a criminal and it's a pity he was not hanged after due process of law. However, let's not make Kennedy into more than what he was: an heir of a wrong-headed turn of the American body politic.
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.