Submitted by Jon(United States), Dec 14, 2007 at 12:28
It would make much more sense to argue that liberalism/progressivism's decline was already begun by the time of the Kennedy assassination (having been in power for decades), and that JFK's death was a violent symbol of the end of heroic liberalism. As the nation faced increasingly intractable foreign and domestic policy problems, the public grew fatigued with old -guard liberal remedies; within 5 years of JFK's death, the Left was splintered and Richard Nixon was elected president. The Left's turn toward socio-cultural issues should be seen as pragmatic, having lost credibility on the "harder" political issues of the day.
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.