69 million page views

D'Souza plays perverted game of 'good cop' 'bad cop' presents Al Qaeda as having socially redeeming value

Reader comment on item: Dinesh D'Souza Walks on the Dark Side

Submitted by Ben van de Polder (United States), Mar 8, 2007 at 09:04

Dinesh D'Souza goes over to the dark side and off the deep end.

D'Souza has devoted pages of writings to justifying why Islamists have good reason to hate America and the West and their loathing is understandable. There is obviously a pathology at work (schizophrenia combined with abject stupidity?) which makes him present himself as a conservative and then tell Americans that they deserve to be blown up because Islamists rightly find their way of life "digusting".

His position at the Hoover Institution reflects their lack of of moral compass as well. Here is a random quote form D'Souza published (in of all places) the conservative NRO! A paen to Sayid Qutyb arguing that his ideas are no different from that of classical philosphers.

Perhaps the NRO decided to publish his screed -( which would have been more at home in Counterpunch or ZNet) just because D'Souza presents himself as a conservative. It is also a sorry commentary about the carte blanche aka affirmative dhimmitude/paternalism shown to anyone who is of 'non Western' background that is perceived to be on 'our side' even if they are wacko conspiracy theorists or total idiots whose only goal is to promote themselves.

In the case of D'Souza it is far worse then just crass opportunism-he is using his position to justify the critique of the West made by radical Islamists , hurting those who are promoting him and harming their cause in the process. D'Souza is playing a perverted game of 'good cop' 'bad cop' and presents Al Qaeda as having some "socially redeeming value". When we he be ostracised for the fifth columnist and crackpot that he is?

Excerpt:

How should we in America evaluate, and answer, Qutb's critique? We need to take Qutb's views seriously, partly because they are taken seriously in the Islamic world, and partly because for all his vehemence, Qutb is raising deep and fundamental questions.

http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/dsouza200407020030.asp

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (30) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
LOVE the gratuitous slam on "foreign service officers" (sic) [19 words]JeffMay 1, 2007 16:3691253
D'souza [131 words]joshuaApr 10, 2007 17:1188980
Ahh...D'Souza [157 words]Pro-Israeli DemocratMar 25, 2007 19:2287958
1Response to D'Souza [105 words]DAVID R. GROESBECKMar 19, 2007 04:1786842
Palestinian "children" throwing stones. [60 words]ZeenaAug 16, 2012 03:3886842
Overfocus on israel results in blinkered vision [82 words]RaviMar 18, 2007 14:1886760
Where did D'Souza go wrong? [317 words]Dr. M. D'SouzaMar 17, 2007 12:2486631
On the Dark Side of D'Souza [105 words]dsRonMar 16, 2007 23:1986588
discovery of zero [100 words]john h. rubelMar 16, 2007 19:0286560
Zero was an Import from India [27 words]SinghaMar 17, 2007 22:2286560
To Singhel, Rubel and Zero [150 words]LeeMar 27, 2007 06:5186560
TOTALLY WRONG [10 words]roopam royJan 2, 2008 02:5986560
Discovery of Zero [7 words]Dr. Indra MukhopadhyayOct 1, 2008 02:0286560
who discovered the zero? [19 words]aviral kumar mishra.Feb 13, 2009 22:5286560
Discovery of Zero... [258 words]MitraSep 10, 2009 07:2586560
Zero [71 words]MaramSep 23, 2009 19:5886560
Kepler's Motive [66 words]Peter L. GriffithsMay 1, 2011 12:2586560
Kepler's Distance Law [55 words]Peter L. GriffithsAug 13, 2015 11:5186560
Kepler's Distance Law [86 words]Peter L. GriffithsDec 24, 2016 11:2486560
1D'Souza in context [43 words]Gideon KannerMar 16, 2007 12:0386494
1D'Souza book [54 words]Dennis GravesMar 16, 2007 11:2286457
I've read his book... [121 words]JoshuaMar 12, 2007 21:5386092
Sorry Dr. Pipes, I disagree. [194 words]Brooks ImperialMar 12, 2007 16:4286066
D'Souza [23 words]JamaMar 19, 2007 14:5886066
D'Souza plays perverted game of 'good cop' 'bad cop' presents Al Qaeda as having socially redeeming value [319 words]Ben van de PolderMar 8, 2007 09:0481714
Dinesh D'Souza Blames the West and secularists for Muslim rage [204 words]Ben van de PolderMar 7, 2007 20:1780769
Revert? [25 words]DaisyMar 7, 2007 13:4980704
His dark side? [31 words]surjitMar 17, 2007 18:3180704
Surjit [65 words]DaisyMar 17, 2007 22:4480704
D'Souza [79 words]Drs Sears AppalsamyMar 18, 2007 09:1580704

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)