69 million page views

Obvious Obfuscation: Not JCPOA; But the Intent of Its Authors in Diversionary Tactics

Reader comment on item: The Need for a Focus on Western Islamism
in response to reader comment: JCPOA: The Elephant in the ROOM

Submitted by M Tovey (United States), Feb 7, 2022 at 19:55

So, what is it? Are we to fear the Russians? How about the Chinese CCP? How about the Iranian Islamic Regime and its proxy wargaming that woould lead to the diminishment, then elimination of Israel's prominence in the Middle East? Or, how about all of it, in the proximal order of domination as determined by who is on first; then second; then bringing in the final apparition of globalistic ambitions of the imperial sort.
But first, that was the clue that brought about the lost idea of the American search for peace by offering freedoms American style, only to be betrayed by a false presentation of how those freedoms were to be paid for; on the backs of the American taxpayer. Even when supposedly sanctioned, Iranian ambitions were never stopped, even in the attempt of the 45th American Administration's order to cease paying for Iranian Islamic Regimes flippant rejection of nuclear development; they barely skipped a beat. A multiple pallet delivery of American taxpayer largesse went along way to buy a pause of evil intent, not being revived by the currnet American Administration's impotent and flagrantly patronistic empty debates of nuclear control by proxy.
What pauses the Russian incursion? Nothing that the Americans have control over.
What pauses the Iranian Islamic Regime's nuclear development of a nuclear deterrent to keep the west out of their intentions of imposing ummah in the Middle East, even for the short while they might have been successful; but what happens when Russia interferes? What is the true diversion here? Anyone?

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Obvious Obfuscation: Not JCPOA; But the Intent of Its Authors in Diversionary Tactics by M Tovey

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2022 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)