|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Salman Rushdi revisitedReader comment on item: The Rushdie Fatwa 25 Years Later Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Feb 15, 2014 at 09:45 Dr. Pipes The book the Satanic Verses was not great literature but Salman Rushdie indeed opened the flood gates for other Muslims to examine their religion with a microscope and the results are very interesting as in the case of the great web site http://www.ahewar.org/debat/nr.asp In this web site everything that pertains to islam and the Arab world is discussed and debated even the story of the Satanic Verses http://www.ahewar.org/debat/show.art.asp?aid=113341 And this is indeed a very great review of the fable of the Satanic Verses and i suspect that this would not have happened just a few years ago More interesting is that many Muslims are realizing that the Islamic tradition is full of embarrassing traditions and now we have this great facebook page where Muslims post about bizarre traditions transmitted by the likes of al-Bukhari and about bizarre fatwas https://www.facebook.com/takarifsheihk Again this would not have happened if Rushdie did not open the flood gates
Dislike
Submitting....
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". |
Latest Articles |
|||||||||||
All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes (The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998. For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.) |