Oh - the formula!

Submitted by Amin Riaz (United Kingdom), Apr 25, 2013 at 21:21

"Taqqiya Amin strikes again"

Childish name calling. Again!

- - -

"Like your denial of your constant self praise? Every second post you write how great or clever you are."

Actually - this is YOUR lying claim . . .

And I highlighted your stupidity - when you accused me of this in the first place . . . And I asked you to highlight what self-praise . . . what did you highlight?

Yep - the bit of the CURRENT Post.

Shame? But you have none . . . like I point out - you motivation here is to spew - petty insults, hatred and prejudice.

Look - a perfect example.

- - -

"Would you me like to list your blatant lies? I am not sure we have that much time."

In other words . . . you have "lies" - and clearly the claim was false . . the single example you mustered - it was in fact YOUR lie.

- - -

"I NEVER inferred I want to ban the burka and you blatantly accused me of wanting to ban the burka"

I think you need to look up the meaning of the word "infer".

Inference was mine - from YOUR arguing . . .

Simple - if you are NOT after banning the Burqa - the why are you squabbling?

- - -

"and I asked many times when I ever stated that! You ignored my MANY requests for you to put up or shut up, you then claim to have answered it. When? You are busted lying again."

Hardly - I have answered by saying - if you do not seek banning of the Burqa - why are you squabbling?

Did you answer? Nope . . . why? To get to this! Petty and false accusations . .

- - -

"I specifically mentioned the Nazi Swastika, you kept going off on tangents about the Hindu Swastika. I was very precise, you were muddying the waters."

Swastika is a symbol. Nazi adoption was of the old symbol. Its banning is NOT of the symbol - but its intended use . . . your point of mentioning was to provide example of how West bans clothing . . . however - this is was poor example!

Read your comment back. . . and see.

- - -

"I mentioned the need to regulate the Burka, I was very specific, you go off on tangents about cars, guns and knives again trying to muddy the waters."

Here you do - what you accuse me of - my replies were to counter specific points . . . look how you have related this . . .

One again - falling on your own sword . . .

- - -

"Then I call you to account for your constant self praise, which is truly childish and irritating, and you deny this and in the same sentence say how wonderful you are."

When you made the accusation - it WAS false - when you were ASKED to give an example - you failed - SPECTACULARLY failed. . .

Smart? - FACT. I am smart.

Intelligent? - FACT - I am Intelligent.

Well Educated? Fact - I am Well educated - up to Master Degree - in 2 distinct subjects.

- - -

Childish?

What do you call petty name calling? What is more childish?

The poor insults . . . the prejudice?

And your long list of previous lies . . . in particular the FORMULA? Which you invented . . .

- - -

"No Amin, you are "Not that great" ... you are just the only person who doesnt realise it. You insult others constantly, and they cry foul when you are called to account, grow up little man."

Again - another lie. It is pretty easy to see . . . as it your job to constantly insult me . . . once again - you will fail to find a single example of me insulting you.

- - -

Like I keep pointing out . . .and you keep avoiding - why all the petty insults and the sheer childishness . . I mean name calling?

Really?

What was you argument? Nothing . . . it was just to squabble - even at that you are not very good. Read back what you write . . .

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".