69 million page views

Pakistan must be declared a terrorist state - Salman Rushdie

Reader comment on item: Islamist Apparel Banned in France
in response to reader comment: Condolences expressed for Osama bin Laden in Pak parliament

Submitted by surinder97 (United States), May 14, 2011 at 22:50

Subj: Pakistan must be declared a terrorist state - Salman Rushdie

1. Should we accept Salman Rushdie's recommendation, and declare Pakistan as a terrorist state, away from the comity of civilized nations? Pakistan has the mark of recognition, and nods & becks of Jihadic-Smiles, by hiding World's most-wanted terrorist, Osama Bin Laden. The Dumb-Ass Jihadist, Osama Bin Laden ( OBL ), met his maker, ten years after inflicting his own horror of 9/11. Finding their mark, the Yanki-Marcos ( Marine-Commandos ), warned others of OBL-Ilk:

" Mess with us, and we will plaster you ( with bullets ).

" 2. Taking a look at the rusticity & treachery of our friend, Pakistan, we notice that Pakis have been floating misinformation, for the benefit of us Yanki-Hunters that OBL was living in the mountains, hiding somewhere in the porous Pakistan-Afghanistan border. Actually, Pakis were hiding OBL, right in the heart of Pakistan, totally undetected, right under the nose of ISI & Pakistani-Military, in a plush-compound, where he will be least suspected. It was the most-clandestine operation of ISI & Paki-Military. In spite of this, the highest officials of Paki government had the temerity to say:

" We don't know where OBL is, but he is Not in Pakistan. "

3. It was a highly-professional job of Paki-Concealment, it was a Stealthy-Insertion of OBL inside Pakistan. That is how come OBL slipped under our radar for over ten years. But Pakis are not the only ones who can play the game of stealth. Using our technological resources, we can beat the Pakis at their own game of stealth, can ferret out hiding places of OBL. Our Marcos ( Marine-Commandos ) had technological-tricks of their own. Even though they hovered in Paki airspace for over 2 hours, Pakis never knew where they were, nor when they touched down in OBL compound, to kick OBL's Ass. It was a perfect-game of stealth, ( imitation is the best kind of flattery ), it is the same game that Pakis have been playing against us for over ten years. So Pakis really cannot blame us ( for this offer of flattery ). So why is this hoopla & Hue & Cry of violation of sovereignty, all across Pakistan ? It makes no sense !

4. Coming back to the subject of declaring Pakistan as a terrorist state, it is worth recognizing that Pakistan has been aptly labelled as the Epicenter of Terrorism. It has training camps, for training Jihadis, who send Kafirs ( Non-Moslem Infidels ) to Jhanam ( Hell ) with routine efficiency. Pakistan-Produced terrorists are Jihad-Drunk, just like cocaine-cowboys. More & more Moslem boys from Europe, Arabia, and elsewhere, are traveling to Pakistan, for training in Jihad Any one who has one brain-cell in his skull, will not want to earn rewards of stupidity, by believing the rampage of lies, that Pakistan has been putting out.

5. USA seems to have gotten wise to Paki-Lies. USA, judiciously, did not clue Pakis in, on the operation. If they had, Pakis would have tipped OBL off, and he won't be there when the Navy Marcos arrive, and the unity of time, place, and action, would have been destroyed.

7. Salman Rushdie's remarks about Pakistan, is a fair assessment of what makes Pakistan tick, and its attempt to perpetuate Islam & its imperialism. In theory, Islam means surrender to Allah,but in practice, it is subjugation of Kafirs ( Non-Moslem Infidels ) to the imperialism & terrorism of Islam. 8. To sum up, Pakistan is a Fully-Qualified Terrorist State, and Salman Rushdie's recommendation is consummately-appropriate.

Surinder Paul Attri

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (49) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
2Adhan on loudspeakers [167 words]PrashantMar 27, 2021 11:01265085
Yes, adhan is played on loudspeaker [61 words]A very concerned readerMar 27, 2021 23:38265085
I just came to read this in regards to the adhan [157 words]A very concerned readerMar 28, 2021 04:36265085
2Sad to hear about adhan on loudspeakers in Australia [55 words]PrashantMar 29, 2021 19:03265085
1Mumbai in India achieved a miracle: No adhan on loudspeakers in Mumbai [247 words]PrashantSep 12, 2022 10:12265085
2"First, it was the niqab, today the food": France to ban the halal chicken slaughtering from July 2021 [232 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
A very concerned readerMar 21, 2021 19:05264913
2I would need to know current French regulations in regards to this [142 words]A very concerned readerMar 22, 2021 15:54264913
2The second part of my last comment [81 words]A very concerned readerMar 22, 2021 16:37264913
1Observation of Whose Law? [147 words]M ToveyMar 23, 2021 18:48264913
2Let us teach them Beethoven and worry not about how they kill their Chicken. [179 words]PrashantMar 23, 2021 20:55264913
2Teaching them about music is a utopia, unfortunately [164 words]A very concerned readerMar 24, 2021 15:08264913
Why France wants this: my reflection about why little acts can be dangerous when it comes to Islam [293 words]A very concerned readerMar 26, 2021 05:35264913
Societal bonhomie, law and Islamic attitudes [432 words]PrashantSep 13, 2022 02:48264913
6I agree with France [16 words]satinkaApr 15, 2011 23:10184313
one belief over all others [153 words]Jules PostenApr 15, 2011 18:55184305
No compulsion in religion [89 words]Naushad OmarJun 23, 2011 13:46184305
1Islamic violence and ayat al-sayf abrogates ayat la ikrah! Oh the Arabic! [334 words]dhimmi no moreJun 23, 2011 19:56184305
3Reasons for Banned Burqas [59 words]H.WellerApr 14, 2011 20:59184261
1Islamist Apparel Banned in France, Talk about Oppression. [86 words]AnneApr 14, 2011 07:44184244
Islamist Apparel [111 words]JanApr 14, 2011 16:16184244
What about Head Scarfs? response to Jan. [111 words]AnneApr 14, 2011 17:45184244
Dear Ann [392 words]JanApr 16, 2011 04:34184244
Head Scarfs are being worn in the USA by many Islamic women and are not forbidden.- response to Jan [426 words]AnneApr 16, 2011 20:02184244
Going the extra mile [62 words]Naushad OmarJun 23, 2011 13:51184244
Islamist Apparel Banned in France ....If its what they want to do. response to Naushad Omar [155 words]AnneJun 23, 2011 18:48184244
NANCY BURKAH PELOSI [83 words]PHILLIP LEMKINApr 13, 2011 18:15184232
No figleaf for French law [50 words]Andre in BaltimoreApr 13, 2011 09:57184222
At last ,A Reasonable Law Enacted in France [53 words]BerengariaApr 13, 2011 09:29184221
Face covering, please? Don't be shy! [110 words]Henry Spelter Sr.Apr 13, 2011 08:59184220
it's a start [27 words]DAVID R.GROESBECKApr 12, 2011 23:43184210
5Not a religious garment [190 words]Dan B.Apr 12, 2011 23:11184208
1Veil or no veil [58 words]steven lApr 12, 2011 22:15184205
Islamist Apparel [107 words]Dan RusenApr 12, 2011 21:35184203
Shameful practice [71 words]Rebecca MouldsApr 12, 2011 20:36184200
1France detains two women as burqa ban takes effect [504 words]surinder97Apr 12, 2011 20:32184199
An Australian convert tells about his views on Democracy [311 words]surinder97Apr 19, 2011 20:33184199
1Slavery-Scourge imposed by Islam [845 words]surinder97Apr 25, 2011 03:34184199
1The Illusions and Disillusions of the Muslim Youth [465 words]surinder97May 1, 2011 02:44184199
OSAMA BIN LADEN'S PUZZLE-PIECES [197 words]surinder97May 5, 2011 23:31184199
Comments on "OSAMA BIN LADEN'S PUZZLE-PIECES " [148 words]surinder97May 8, 2011 04:13184199
2Condolences expressed for Osama bin Laden in Pak parliament [637 words]surinder97May 11, 2011 02:38184199
Pakistan must be declared a terrorist state - Salman Rushdie [601 words]surinder97May 13, 2011 00:06184199
Photo of the day [110 words]surinder97May 14, 2011 22:29184199
14Pakistan must be declared a terrorist state - Salman Rushdie [600 words]surinder97May 14, 2011 22:50184199
CCTV, A Chinese Television shown India's map after truncating Kashmir on May 13, 2011 [767 words]surinder97May 15, 2011 04:17184199
Now recover damages from Pakistan, stop Charity is not enoghs its hightime . [130 words]Ravi Ranjan Singh Bharat PanthiMay 15, 2011 15:03184199
Now recover damages from Pakistan, stop Charity is not enogh, its hightime [131 words]Ravi Ranjan Singh Bharat PanthiMay 15, 2011 15:04184199
They did what they are supposed to do [2 words]Ravi Ranjan Singh Bharat PanthiMay 15, 2011 15:06184199
1Comments on Pakistan's Bad Kismet [332 words]surinder97May 21, 2011 04:21184199

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Pakistan must be declared a terrorist state - Salman Rushdie by surinder97

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)