69 million page views

Crerry picking time? Really? You are not even original

Reader comment on item: The Temple Mount's Indian counterpart
in response to reader comment: Cherry picking time

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Jun 17, 2010 at 07:14

Our dear Deb whose ancestors the Hindus were brutalized by islam and who cannot even read the book of Arabian ignorance in its original language Arabic

"The early history of Islam following inscription and numismatic testimony" by Volker Popp and you will find it in Gerd Puin's collection "The Hidden Origns of islam"

And this is his ... answer

>My Answer : Two old German hagards these Volker Popp and Gerd Puin. No body gives a damn about what they have to say.

Typical poor Muslim education so

1. Did you read the article? let me guess you did not

2. If you did read the article then did you understand what they wrote? Let me guess you would not and do you know whay? Becuase you must know Arabic and Syriac so do you know Arabic and Syriac mr ignorant? Let me guess you do not right?

3. And if you did read the article then why not refute what they are saying? Let me guess becuase you cannot right?

4. For the readers Gerd Puin was the "old German" that was selceted by our dear Deb the wannabe Arab Arab masters in Sana' in-order to read and restore the Sana' Quranic leafs now why did they not ask a tablighhe like you to do such a job? Could it be because you do not know any Arabic ... ?

Shame on you for uttering this nonsense

"It is built like a Byzantine Church! It does not even look like a mosque"

>My Answer : This is exactly what happens when you come to conclusion about something without analyzing it.

Hello: this is the first monument in Islam right? then why does it look like a Church?any guesses? and even the theology in the inscriptions is very much Christian and Nestorian as in saying

wa al-salamu 3alayhi yawma wulida wa yawma yamutu wa yawma yub3ath hayya

Oh so does the Qur'an says that Jesus died and was resurected? Oh I forgot that the Umayyads were really Christians

>Who told you that a mosque should always have a specific look all the time throughout the centuries !!!!!

Hello: It is the first Chruch I mean mosque in the saga of the religion of the Arabs the question is why did your masters the Arabs avoided building other mosques like Byzantine Churches? so where would I find toed other later mosques that look like Byzantine Churches in Jerusalem? Could it be because al-3abbasiyuun wanted a very different path from the Umayyads that they hated very much because they were regarded as kuffar and hedonists and Chrsitians after all the umayyads loved Damascus with its wine and dancing girls and great food. Mecca? It is a later invention of al-3abbasiyuun just like their mosques

>Remember early Chinese mosques looked alike Chinese pagodas. Does that mean that the early Chinese Muslims were Buddhists ?

Hello: This is not China Jerusalem is not very far from Arabia and do you know what? There were no mosques in 692CE period not in Mecca or Medina or any where

So why would the Umayyads build a mosque (sic ) that look like a Church unless they were Christians right?

>Another case in point. Almost all major Christian buildings in Russia have domes like Mosques does it mean that the famous Russian Czars were all Muslims ?

Hello: we are talking about the first monument in the religion of the Arabs

Oh I forgot the inscriptions and for this stay tuned and more evidence that the Umayyads were Christian

> "Remember the Crusaders were sworn enemies of the Orthodox creed so do you think that there is any reason that why the Crusaders did not destroy the Al-Aqsa mosque ? Because they knew that it is a Mosque and destruction of that Mosque would bring the animosity and thereby destruction of the crusader states."

You said : "Hello: the Crusaders cared less about Islam or public opinions for this matter"

>My follow up : Yes. So why did they not destroy the Al-Aqsa Mosque ?

Hello: they cared less and they were only intersted in looting and no more as a matter of fact if they did not attack the caravans of the Arabs we would have had the decendants of the crusaders still residing in Jerusalem

Your masters the Arabs cared less about the catastrophe that was taking place in Jerusalem and about their Muslim brothers there but once their caravans were attacked they reacted you see it is all about the loot

>Do you want me to believe that all the Crusaders were secret Muslims who converted to Islam en masse ?


">You have made following outrageous claims :1. The first four Caliphs did not exist."

Right there is no extant historical evidence that any of al-khulafa' al-rashduun existed!

>My Answer : And similarly there is no extant evidence that Paul Revere or the so-called Midnight Ride took place.

OK let me help you: do you have any extant evidence that would support that such characters did exist? Here is your chance to shine our dear deb al-tablighee and I will be watching you making a fool of yourself again

And I care less if Paul Revere did or did not shout his "the Brits are coming"

But you know what? I'm here to dismantle the foundation of the religion of the Arabs

> Actually I have always believed that most of the so-called midnight ride is nothing but a childhood fiction created by patriotic Americans to brinwash their children.

Sure it can be so what?

">Nestorians never had any good relations with the Byzantines"

"So ?"

>My follow up : So how it is possible that the nestorians would encourage the Arabs to build a building like Al-Aqsa using their enemy Byzantine architecture ?

Mr ignorant the Nestorians had no saying as they had no political power they were only watching what he was doing with great care

>This is just not possible. I hope you understand now that your view that Al-Aqsa is a Byzantine church is nothing but a lie.

Then go and destroy it and bulid a structure that looks like an ugly mosque but before you do so stay tuned for the inscriptions

And by the way the rule of the Nestroians in the religion of the arabs is just amazing as in the case of

1. Bahira al-rahb al-Nistori

>My answer : Wait a minute. If you mention Bahira then you have to assume that Prophet Mohammad also existed. But you yourself has denied the existence of the prophet Mohammad. So how can you use Bahira as a source to prove your point ?

Never said that I said that the islamic histoical tradition tells us that the so called prophet had chats with a Bahira which is no more than another qissa Oh qissa? You can ask your Mullah about the word qissa

And you know what? If there was indeed a real Bahira then how come the EXTANT Syriac sources are silent about such Bahira as in when those Muhajiruun (later known as Arabs and Muslims) invaded the civilized Middle East no one said : "oh those are the Arabs and they are the followers of Muhammad al-tajir who had chats with Bahira"! You explain it to us

But you know what? The bogus islamic tradition did not even get a perfect Syriac word correct as the word Bahira is Arabic rahib so is his name Bahira al-bahira? Or is it rahb al- rahib? It is indeed pathetic but again it is the biggest lie in the history of mankind

2. Ibn Ishaq's family were Nestorians

>My Answer : So what ?

Oh yes he brought with him the Nestorian tradition and it is very clear in the sira and for this see Wansbrough oh I forgot he is old or dead right ?

> Constantine's parents were Roman pagans does it mean that Constantine was a Pagan , too ?

Hello: Muslims tell us that Christianity is very pagan or did you forget? so do you think he brough paganism with him after all your so called prophet brought Arabian paganism to islam

3. The islamic thoelogy as it pertians to Jesus is very much Syrian/Nestorian Christianity

>My Answer : Benjamin Franklin could speak French and was a supporter of French revolution. Does it mean that Benjamin Franklin was a Jacobin like Robespierre ?

Hello: Benjamin Franklin parle le francaise? Sobhanllah! but you know what? He was not write theology

I would end this post to tell u that we do not find any great mention of Paul Revere in the writings of the American founding fathers like Benjamin Franklin or Tom Jeffy (whom you Americans call Thomas Jefferson) . Is it not a sufficient proof that Paul Revere was a fictional character ?

If you believe that they are fictional characters then write a book and you know what? we kuffar love that but you know what? You will be making a fool of yourself ...


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Crerry picking time? Really? You are not even original by dhimmi no more

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2022 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)