Jaladhi, that would be conceptually absurd

Submitted by Devasahayam (United States), Sep 7, 2009 at 12:23

Basically, Islam itself is a religion formed (and "revealed" to a drugged-high goonda) by Satan "masquerading as angel of light" (2 Corinthians 11:14 in Bible) under the name "Allah" (see Isaiah 14:13 for actual translation of "Alah", which is "I will"--the original Hebrew is "alah bamah...." which correctly is translated "I will ascend above The Most High..."). I have, in a 2008 post to a previous Pipes column, shown its rather uncanny similarity to the FINAL false-religion (btw, there is also a theory that Muslims' "Mahdi" is none other than "Beast" of Revelation) of "Beast-666".

Quran's own description of "Allah" as a capricious deceiver certainly does not fit in with Yahweh and His holiness.

Getting to point now: how can you expect a follower (this description fits Shamsud, as well as the other 140 crore or so Muslims) to be able to get the facts straight, especially so long as that same follower continues in that cult?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".