Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Profiling--the Liberals have been forcing it on us for years!
Reader comment on item: More on Naveed Haq, Seattle's Sudden Jihadi

Submitted by Roger Johnson (United States), Aug 23, 2006 at 10:59

I am retired from two separate careers; the US Navy and the Fire Service. In approximately 1980 (give or take a few years), the Liberals forced racial and gender profiling upon these two great institutions under the disguise of Affirmative Action. At one time (in the 90's), there were to be many hirings in Los Angeles and the word was put out that white males need not apply, because these governments were under so much pressure to hire women and certain minorities.

So, the next time a Liberal insists that racial and gender profiling are a violation of human and civil rights, allowing that third young Muslim man to get on your airliner unsearched, remind that Liberal that he's a hypocrit. Then tell the pilot and flight attendants that unless that Muslim young man is put off the plane, that you are getting off.

This profiling that we must do is Terror Profiling. This is life and death. It's to catch the Muslims who are determined to blow up our airplanes. You and I--the Christians, Jews, Athiests, Agnostics--have rights too.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (25) on this item

Title By Date
And now Barack Hussein? [142 words]Yuval Brandstetter MDMay 31, 2009 05:12
I was on pre-jury selection for trial [58 words]Mindy LApr 14, 2008 15:25
Jewish Federation of Greater Seattle [393 words]YnnatchkahFeb 26, 2008 02:53
islam just an excuse to harm what was really his greatest torment [175 words]BradJan 21, 2008 20:47
Brad or Ahmed? [154 words]fatchaMay 14, 2008 16:26
Brad or Ahmed? [129 words]BradMay 14, 2008 19:22
A misogyn and Islam [68 words]B.N.GururajJun 12, 2009 23:02
⇒ Profiling--the Liberals have been forcing it on us for years! [180 words]Roger JohnsonAug 23, 2006 10:59
islam is not a religion [43 words]alan mitchellAug 23, 2006 01:12
use of terms [198 words]G.M. KresselAug 19, 2006 01:09
JEW HATRED, THE U.N. AND REDEMPTION [1353 words]FERN SIDMANAug 11, 2006 15:57
Jew Hatred, the UN, and Redemption [190 words]SusanAug 12, 2006 12:19
Always seems someone wants to kill off the Jews for their own ignorance ! [160 words]KatMar 24, 2007 14:08
Boston Irish vs Dearborn Moslem: [173 words]massachusetts republicanAug 10, 2006 22:32
Maybe off-topic, but ...
[w/response] [38 words]
Victor PurintonAug 10, 2006 17:02
Seattle Jews and Feelings About Muslim Attack [212 words]Seattle Massacre/Naveed HaqAug 9, 2006 21:07
Brainwashed [65 words]Abraham SetoAug 10, 2006 13:28
I agree with you. [319 words]NickAug 11, 2006 13:27
Naveed Afzal Haq [38 words]Lawrence Elie BorgerAug 9, 2006 15:49
Seattle Massacre [139 words]Catherine AdamAug 9, 2006 15:42
Navved Haq [85 words]NachoAug 9, 2006 12:20
Dangers of psychologizing [72 words]VijayAug 9, 2006 10:49
Psycho logic [159 words]donvanAug 18, 2006 11:47
"Truth" (Arabic Haq) in Seattle? [6 words]Harry HoffnerAug 9, 2006 08:46
Authorities in Denial as to the true nature [48 words]David PetteysAug 8, 2006 17:12

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page