islam and its aggressions
Reader comment on item: Subsidizing the Enemy
in response to reader comment: To Amitabh

Submitted by G. Bisvas (Germany), May 20, 2006 at 09:53

To faisal

1)There are fascists among hindus - but hindu fascism is clearly a reaction to islamic fascism. Fascism and totalitarianism however are inherent to islam not to hindu religions. Islam is also an instrument of arabic hegemony and imperialism. These are historically borne-out facts. Islam has destroyed many non-arabic scripts, languages, cultures and identities in the past 1400 years.

2) Liberal muslims are neither capable of nor willing to root out islamo-fascism. In fact they profit from it after a certain time of pretended shame and forgeting about the ill -deeds of these islamo-fascists and aggressors. Liberal muslims are the deep dark waters in which the poisonous water-snakes of islamo-fascism live, rest, feel well, nourish and reproduce themselves. Islamo-fascists are well-protected in areas where the so-called muslim liberals live and this has made it exceedingly difficult for the non-muslims to protect themselves.

3) Islam has never made any contribution to science or technolgy or knowledge. Some persons with muslim names did do it - but they did not take any help or quotes from the kuran for this purpose. Hence it cannot be called an islamic achievement. You don't want islam to be called terrorist ideology merely because some muslims have committed acts of terrorism, then how can you say islam is scientific and progressive merely because some persons with muslim names contributed to science?

4) Muslim population component in India has gone up from 6.5% to 15% in the past 58 years. Hence the muslims are clearly committing a demographic aggression against the non-muslims. So how can they be called innocent? Muslims are using even their pregnant women and new-born infants as instruments of aggression. How much tolerance do you expect from the non-muslims under such circumstances?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".