Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Lumping categories & support for Israel is bipartisan
Reader comment on item: Republicans and Democrats Look at the Arab-Israeli Conflict

Submitted by Emanuel Goldman (United States), Apr 4, 2006 at 18:23

How come "moderate" and "liberal" Dems are presented as two groups but moderate" and "liberal" Repubs are lumped together? (Unless there are hardly any more liberal Repubs?) Wonder what trend THEY would show if broken into two groups? I wonder if they were lumped together because the results did not support your hypothesis?

But aside from the "results", this is a very dangerous exercise for Israel. The LAST thing anyone who cares about Israel should want is politicizing (in the US) the Israel-Arab conflict. This must not be cast in terms of Democrat vs. Republican. It's too important
to Israel's survival, and support for Israel must not be allowed to be cast as a partisan issue. Doing so is a disservice to Israel.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Daniel Pipes replies:

I don't know why Gallup put the moderate and liberal Republicans together - perhaps not many of them?

Agreed, this is not good news for Israel. It was better off two decades ago when left-right differences hardly mattered at all, as I showed at http://www.danielpipes.org/article/169.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (19) on this item

Title By Date
longing for the armageddon? [88 words]G.VishvasJul 5, 2009 07:20
I think this is a combination of things [568 words]JayJun 21, 2009 15:15
help finding article [54 words]roger kleinJan 10, 2009 16:57
The right to defend itself is the right of all countries including Israel [627 words]Tess McNamara (Australian and Pro Israel)Jan 2, 2009 23:29
Names of Republican and Democrats. [8 words]SvetlanatchkaJan 2, 2009 17:38
14 favorable [10 words]YnnatchkahMar 7, 2008 14:09
14 in 100 people are favorable of the Palestinian Authority [69 words]KristaMar 8, 2008 17:51
Your point was better than mine. [10 words]YnnatchkahMar 8, 2008 21:20
Present Arab-Israeli conflict [82 words]John S. HancockJul 16, 2006 22:43
reply to John S. Hancock [125 words]mikeDec 15, 2006 14:05
On "naming the Enemy" [779 words]Christina LuciaApr 21, 2006 18:41
Build a consensus for Israel [49 words]Octavio JohansonApr 13, 2006 11:24
Whether liberal Democrats actually support Israel depends on the definiton of "support" [1496 words]Mark GoldApr 7, 2006 17:04
where are Democrats for Israel-east bay san francisco? [82 words]Shirl FinkApr 17, 2006 21:15
Reply to Mark Gold [382 words]Seamus MacNemiOct 18, 2007 15:38
⇒ Lumping categories & support for Israel is bipartisan
[w/response] [121 words]
Emanuel GoldmanApr 4, 2006 18:23
Bipartisan support for Israel [14 words]Octavio JohansonApr 5, 2006 07:54
A note on one "irregularity" [30 words]pdbApr 4, 2006 11:35
Liberals merely in denial [47 words]Mark GarretsonApr 4, 2006 10:59

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page