69 million page views

A Secular Israel Has No Future-Neither Republican or Democratic-Only a Biblical Future

Reader comment on item: Republicans and Democrats Look at the Arab-Israeli Conflict
in response to reader comment: Fox news motives

Submitted by M. Tovey (United States), Oct 18, 2010 at 18:05

It seems inevitable that any discussion of the political circumstances of Israel's function in this modern world is going to take the tact that Israel does not have a right to her existence on the grounds of Biblical directives, but much has been discussed on the logical secular perspective in order to dismiss the religious reasons for Israel's existence. To be plain, a secular Israel does not have a snowball's chance in the Negev in the summer of survival, either as a democratic society now or whatever form of secular government that might be tried in the future (a split Jerusalem notwithstanding).

Lets us make a comparison. Over two hundred years ago the American Experiment was commenced upon the signatures of our founding countrymen with an eye towards providing liberties no longer enjoyed at the behest of the countries from which they departed, securing the provisions of the founding documents at great cost to themselves, and the successive generations which supplied men and women of dedication to offer sacrifice to keep the original premise alive for succeeding generations, like ours. The documents are a record of sacred trusts passed on to secure those rights for those who have the desire and will to live under those liberties, but only if that sacred trust is preserved. The trust is sacred, not because the founding agents intended to create a religious United States of America, for they did not; but they did honor the Almighty God they served in making His Providence an integral part of the founding papers, which honor is what is being dismissed today. So it is with Israel, to an even greater degree.

In this intersection of perspectives, it is easy to say one does not have to be a member of a church to support Israel, for that is of a truth when one looks at the varying attempts to govern in a secular mode, as many who are members of the Knesset do. Yet what is their success? They are constant alert, on instant response mode, attempting to be ready and quick to deal with most any contingency set upon them while they try, seemingly in vain, to secure a border that is defensible from enemies, from inside as well as abroad. In that vein, they need all the help they can get, but from where?

In America, remnant parts of the Diaspora make up a sizable part of the demographics of American society, Jewish by pedigree, but for some, not Judaic in their observances of things religious. In that sector, it has been heard the State of Israel needs to bargain whatever they can to maintain whatever they can keep. Israel gave up Gaza, yet it was not enough. There is clamoring for the ancient lands of Judea and Samaria by the 'Palestinians,' yet it has been said in Arabic, that will not be enough. Syria wants the Golan back, but Hizbollah in Lebanon says that will not be enough. Were we republican and democrats in America required to cede Alaska to Russia for a promise not to be in virtually constant conflict with the Russians, would that be worth it? Or what if the Mexicans require revocation of the Gadsden Purchase, what should be the decision there for a border that can be secured?

In the secular realm, Israel has no promise of security; it has been maintained that in spite of any political ministering, either republican or democrat from America, Israel has found no true solace or truly reliable support here to insure her security. This is from a mostly secular position, irrespective of the 'religious' undertones that are associated to the right or the left in American politics. When asked how he understood the Bible and how it governs in his life, the previous president indicated they were 'guidelines,' not the inerrant WORD of the LORD. Cast in that perspective, it is now easily understood how he continued in error to push for the 'two state' solution, one that is recognized by most parties as untenable in all except the most esoteric realms of reasoning, all against the Biblical directives.

So it is easy to see where many who have been advised by some who have had a great deal of time to see the universe in a secularist perspective to come to a conclusion that the world has a different view than that which is defined from a Biblical perspective. Yet it is here that we can make the observation that Einstein was wrong, that to merely honor the Bible from an uninformed point of view such as his was to be his undoing; time cannot be conquered in this reality: neither can the Truth of the Holy Bible be conquered.

But here lies a truth; time is on Israel's side. Were this not true, how is it that Israel, of all the ancient national entities we have to read about, is still here? It is waste of time to engage in the speculations; the answer is plain for those who have understanding to see. Israel exists, not because of religion, but in spite of it. If Judaism were the reigning religion, then there would be no Christianity, and Israel would exist along with the first or second temples as the center of the world. But that is yet to come.

Israel as a political center of the world is a still-to-be-seen reality, and it will be imbued with all the of the promises that the world dismisses in the Holy Bible, when that time is realized. Until then, the world will continue to comfort itself with the attempts at world peace that will always be elusive, and Israel, religious or not, finally returns to the truth of her existence. Then all the political posturing, republican and democrats here in America, and the other governments of the world clamoring for peace at Israel's espense, will be brought to nought by the realization that peace will be according to the promises of the Holy Bible; and arguments such as the need for the diminution of the Holy Bible will no longer be a reason for discussion, but Biblical life will be the only reality, for Israel especially, and for the world in practicality.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submitting....

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (56) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
1Divergence Started With Oslo Failures [223 words]DaveDec 28, 2016 13:31234944
US conservatives have changed; but not necessarily because of Israel [634 words]Michael SJan 14, 2017 10:49234944
Good Point Re Cold War [46 words]DaveJan 19, 2017 08:00234944
Maybe God wanted us all to have a turn being stupid. [290 words]Michael SJan 21, 2017 01:32234944
put a fork in it [12 words]cvtJul 13, 2015 15:37224178
2So why do American Jews support Democrats? [8 words]Fred McMurrayApr 20, 2015 10:17222968
bothersome pop-ups from danielpipes.org [269 words]Michael SMay 2, 2015 09:35222968
Ho hum -- another dynastic sham [84 words]Michael SApr 18, 2015 09:00222938
American Diplomacy on a Ride It will not be Able to Dismount [265 words]M. ToveyMay 4, 2015 16:03222938
Old water, old wineskins, old names [83 words]Michael SMay 8, 2015 10:10222938
Is Jewish support for PM Cameron and PM Harper a leading indicator of change? [79 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
PezDispenserApr 16, 2015 13:26222902
Jewish demographics and politics not easily generalized [372 words]Michael SMay 17, 2015 11:17222902
Trouble for America means trouble for the world [95 words]Michael SApr 16, 2015 04:20222890
Update time? [250 words]R. CraigenSep 8, 2012 02:18198453
Democrats and Israel [76 words]nadiaFeb 22, 2012 02:01193552
Perspective on Diversity [66 words]Straight_Talk_LuigiNov 1, 2010 23:19179832
4the current "peace talks" [219 words]Jules PostenOct 17, 2010 15:45179359
Fox news motives [177 words]AnonOct 16, 2010 18:40179317
Disrespectful and ill conceived comments [180 words]saraOct 16, 2010 19:14179317
It's not so simple [284 words]Peter HerzOct 16, 2010 19:23179317
Just speaking my mind [140 words]AnonOct 16, 2010 22:18179317
2Jews as a people or a religion [405 words]saraOct 17, 2010 19:54179317
1A Secular Israel Has No Future-Neither Republican or Democratic-Only a Biblical Future [1041 words]M. ToveyOct 18, 2010 18:05179317
please don't say that [75 words]mariahNov 14, 2010 03:17179317
fairy tale?? [129 words]y Brandstetter MDJun 23, 2011 11:30179317
the overriding factor [25 words]Jules PostenMar 30, 2010 13:13170775
1Three Overwhelming Facts/Arguments Being Ignored [373 words]Ron ThompsonMar 29, 2010 23:17170761
Kill the myth of "linkage" for America's sake [714 words]Randall P.Mar 29, 2010 14:46170755
A vote of no-confidence in Netanyahu [77 words]J SheffMar 29, 2010 13:55170754
do away with terms "pro-israel" or "pro-palestinian" [28 words]mayaMar 27, 2010 19:53170701
Questions and Hands [146 words]Jay1Mar 26, 2010 20:12170651
Each party and ideology should support the one country in the entie Middle East that is not planning to kill us. i.e. ISRAEL ! ..Mar 2010 [37 words]Phil GreendMar 26, 2010 15:05170642
longing for the armageddon? [88 words]G.VishvasJul 5, 2009 07:20158497
It won't be Armageddon [23 words]Tom DundeeMar 27, 2010 15:56158497
I think this is a combination of things [568 words]JayJun 21, 2009 15:15157731
help finding article [54 words]roger kleinJan 10, 2009 16:57147675
2The right to defend itself is the right of all countries including Israel [627 words]Tess McNamara (Australian and Pro Israel)Jan 2, 2009 23:29146704
1Names of Republican and Democrats. [8 words]SvetlanatchkaJan 2, 2009 17:38146675
14 favorable [10 words]YnnatchkahMar 7, 2008 14:09121997
14 in 100 people are favorable of the Palestinian Authority [69 words]KristaMar 8, 2008 17:51121997
Your point was better than mine. [10 words]YnnatchkahMar 8, 2008 21:20121997
Present Arab-Israeli conflict [82 words]John S. HancockJul 16, 2006 22:4349853
reply to John S. Hancock [125 words]mikeDec 15, 2006 14:0549853
1What Has Israel Done For the Palestinians? [60 words]Glenda LoughMar 27, 2010 16:0749853
1On "naming the Enemy" [779 words]Christina LuciaApr 21, 2006 18:4143765
Excellent [14 words]Glenda LoughMar 27, 2010 16:1343765
Build a consensus for Israel [49 words]Octavio JohansonApr 13, 2006 11:2443114
Whether liberal Democrats actually support Israel depends on the definiton of "support" [1496 words]Mark GoldApr 7, 2006 17:0442652
where are Democrats for Israel-east bay san francisco? [82 words]Shirl FinkApr 17, 2006 21:1542652
Reply to Mark Gold [382 words]Seamus MacNemiOct 18, 2007 15:3842652
I Am A Supporter [118 words]Tom DundeeMar 27, 2010 16:2542652
Lumping categories & support for Israel is bipartisan [121 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Emanuel GoldmanApr 4, 2006 18:2342366
Bipartisan support for Israel [14 words]Octavio JohansonApr 5, 2006 07:5442366
There is actuallly only one separation. [32 words]Tom DundeeMar 27, 2010 16:3442366
A note on one "irregularity" [30 words]pdbApr 4, 2006 11:3542306
Liberals merely in denial [47 words]Mark GarretsonApr 4, 2006 10:5942304

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to A Secular Israel Has No Future-Neither Republican or Democratic-Only a Biblical Future by M. Tovey

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

ADVERTISEMENTS

eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2019 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)