as usual blame others for your problems...typical
Reader comment on item: Keeping Muslim Girls under Wraps in France
in response to reader comment: To prove the case, throw in the whole thing

Submitted by Aumprakash reddy (United States), Jan 10, 2006 at 17:03

let me quote your own words Mr.taimur

"In my posts, I have pointed out only flaws in logic by illustrating how the arguments are flawed. I have refrained from shifting the blame. When I spoke of Hindu influences, I didn't say that there is something wrong with Hinduism,but that the influence of Hinduism on some people makes them do something un-Islamic "

your words in next post

"Regarding the Mogul rule, my fathers themselves were practicing Hindus. Don't misunderstand my intentions, but everyone knows about the tradition of SATI - when your husband dies, the widow is *burned* with him. "

By your own word south asian musslims should be practicing evil sati because they are influenced by hinduism....
HINDUISM (SANTANA DHARMA--ETERNAL PATH) is an evolving religion, its keep changing with the times, its not frozen in the 7th century like islam.

now let talk about the origins of evil SATi

"Widow burning, the practice as understood today, started to become more extensive after about 1200 AD, and the end of the hindu empire. This is sometimes ascribed to the decline of Hinduism in India, the rise of Islam societies. Some accounts claim that this rise in the incidences of sati was in response to the ""Islamic conquest"" of South Asia. The women didn't want to be enslaved by the conquerors and chose death over dishonor." reat more at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sati_%28practice%29

Now u know what your ancestor (mohammedans) contibuted to hinduism SATI...great ...

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.