Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Yet another misleading article
Reader comment on item: [Brandon Mayfield Case:] "If You Are Muslim, You Are Suspect"

Submitted by ASRUL AKMAL SHAFIE (United Kingdom), Jul 15, 2005 at 16:51

The additional reason that you gave to support Mr Mayfield's incarceration is another example of misunderstanding (intentional or not) of Islamic teaching and movement that have been consistently hammered to general public. In the past few years, the media has consistently equated Wahabbism, anti-American, and anti Semitism as militant. If these are really used to measure muslim militancy, then your title really rang true (If you are a muslim, you are a suspect). Wahabbism is just an Islamic teaching that encourages Muslim to stick to the Holy Book, Al-Quran and Prophet teaching and disregard anything other than these. That would of course be a good thing because the pure teaching themselves encourage tolerance and peace. Looking at the way American government treat Muslim in the past and now, I don't think it should be a surprise that Muslim feel a deep resentment toward America especially in this Bush era whereby Muslim countries had been deliberately targeted and destroyed, while other terrorist country are ignored.
I also don't think we should generalized everybody that oppose Israel colonization and oppression of Palestine as antiSemitism.
Again I hope that the media would stop harping on its myopic view on Islam and start to listen to Muslim.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (26) on this item

Title By Date
My view on the matter... [195 words]LuposianNov 29, 2006 23:39
⇒ Yet another misleading article [202 words]ASRUL AKMAL SHAFIEJul 15, 2005 16:51
Circumstantial evidence [119 words]Lynda ChristianJun 12, 2004 11:45
The challenge to Islam in America [123 words]steven bowmanJun 11, 2004 01:18
How did the terrorists get here in the first place? [277 words]RussJun 7, 2004 17:42
this is why [344 words]political PC has to stopMar 25, 2006 10:56
Rightly so [139 words]JaniceJun 4, 2004 20:10
Great article. [22 words]MichaelJun 4, 2004 20:08
If.... [16 words]Richard CookJun 4, 2004 14:45
Right on! ISLAMIC ACTIVISM = "Victims R Us"! [96 words]John BrockJun 4, 2004 13:14
call a spade a shovel [33 words]Jonathan SilvermanJun 3, 2004 22:06
Why isn't this OUT THERE? [52 words]ChavaJun 3, 2004 15:29
Muslims are suspects ? [41 words]Bobby LoJun 2, 2004 20:30
Illuminating [15 words]ferederick I Kaplan Ph.DJun 2, 2004 20:14
We'll see him again [38 words]Hal ByrdJun 2, 2004 10:45
In agreement [80 words]acmJun 2, 2004 10:12
The truth shall prevail [121 words]David NurNov 29, 2006 18:24
Quote out of context [119 words]Ben KurtzerJun 2, 2004 09:57
Mr. Mayfield- to Raj [244 words]RGJun 2, 2004 08:15
Kevin Bacon quote [202 words]Richard WhittenJun 2, 2004 01:44
"Saudi Specialist" [213 words]Carool KerstenJun 1, 2004 22:15
Tip of the iceberg [82 words]Darwin BarrettJun 1, 2004 18:29
weak ending [67 words]floydJun 1, 2004 15:23
Islamic Danger [314 words]Dan RusenJun 1, 2004 13:58
If you are muslim you are suspect [272 words]Derek JohnJun 1, 2004 13:36
well done [177 words]John W. McGinleyJun 1, 2004 13:02

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page