Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Crookes hamas pals - the new nazis and their ally
Reader comment on item: [Alastair Crooke's Conflict Forum and] Sharing Jokes with Hamas

Submitted by Rob Klein (United States), Apr 21, 2005 at 10:08

It seems that Crooke's complicity with Hamas and other islamofascist groups is close to the norm for England and much of Europe. For England, this is especially sad because they were almost left standing completely alone to be defeated by the Germans in WWII. Fortunately the events unfolded in just the right way that allowed them ultimate victory. That was a shared victory with the United States and others. As the third reich was burning, another reality was revealed. That was the holocaust, one of the worst horrors ever seen by mankind. The holocaust proved that if the anti-semites of the world and especially of europe, were left unchecked, it could result in the ultimate disaster for the jewish population. Israel was born because of the holocaust. It was born because the jews of the world and especially europe needed a place where they could live SAFELY.

Today Alastair Crooke and his like minded countrymen are in a sense on the side of the new nazis, forgetting that lesson and acting as if true disaster for the jewish people isn't a possibility - or maybe they don't care if it is. They should be called out on this forgetfulness and hatefulness. Israel should declare loudly that she is here to stay and that she will not sit by and allow her people to be murdered en-masse again. No matter what these hate mongers say, that message should be repeated like a mantra until they understand that Israel is a rock that can't be moved.

Crooke fails to realize that a new reality may emerge in england with his close friends from hamas. That reality is that these terror groups have no qualms about killing europeans as well as jews, remember spain. Crooke (appropriately named) can get in bed with vermin if he likes but he shouldn't for a moment believe that he and his countrymen will be exempt from terror themselves. I guess because Spain was the only recent victim he feels safe cavorting with them, he just may have to learn the hard way.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (26) on this item

Title By Date
Jokes are good [45 words]Elsi VacanoJan 12, 2007 20:58
Too long...Give a break!! [279 words]Harish RamaswamyDec 1, 2006 01:05
Reason trumps Emotion (Unless you're a fanatic...) [1377 words]usesomelogicJun 8, 2006 14:52
alastair Crook et.al. [110 words]Simon WatneyJun 5, 2006 04:10
The EU and Hamas [110 words]Daniel MeturganMay 5, 2005 15:47
Good Grief! [353 words]BruceApr 26, 2005 13:23
Reply to Bruce [86 words]Seamus MacNemiSep 12, 2007 00:08
Maybe It Has Something to Do With Their "Public" Schools [44 words]JakeApr 23, 2005 10:03
Reply to Jake [91 words]Seamus MacNemiSep 12, 2007 00:29
Relativism [106 words]Octavio JohansonApr 21, 2005 18:55
Muslim hatred [219 words]Dan KatcherApr 21, 2005 15:14
You said it RIGHT! Thank you! [348 words]DonnaJan 30, 2007 02:33
Megalomania [70 words]Gaspar TociApr 21, 2008 23:46
Details & omissions [334 words]CApr 21, 2005 11:32
⇒ Crookes hamas pals - the new nazis and their ally [345 words]Rob KleinApr 21, 2005 10:08
Hamazis: an apt title. [50 words]Richard L. KocherFeb 19, 2006 09:52
What is Islam's Nature? [114 words]Timothy B. RobertsApr 21, 2005 00:11
Tolerance of intolerance? [57 words]L DixonMar 30, 2008 10:05
Diplomacy and Terrorism [105 words]JohnApr 20, 2005 21:27
Wishful thinking [56 words]Bernard ArkulesApr 20, 2005 17:06
Let us go back to basics [189 words]Octavio JohansonApr 20, 2005 14:43
Alastair Crooke - a coincidence? [30 words]Peggy KazApr 20, 2005 14:14
Reply to Peggy Kaz [53 words]Seamus MacNemiSep 12, 2007 00:49
Our Man in the Trenches [182 words]Dave M. O'NeillApr 20, 2005 12:12
Muslims do not hate our values. They hate our policies. [95 words]PatApr 20, 2005 12:11
Sharing Jokes with Hamas [13 words]Herb StoneApr 20, 2005 10:55

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page