69 million page views

Details & omissions

Reader comment on item: [Alastair Crooke's Conflict Forum and] Sharing Jokes with Hamas

Submitted by C (United States), Apr 21, 2005 at 11:32

Thank you, Dr. Pipes. for writing another important column to help the citizens of the world read between the lines of the usual apologia for terrorism. The omissions from most newspaper articles, as the details you have described of the meetings Crooke et al. have had, are as frightening as the blatant "spin" in favor of those who wish to use unspeakable violence to advance their "cause." There continues to be a standard of relativism perpetuated by too many "leaders" and writers: who the victims are will determine how the story is reported. Attempts to minimize the immorality of acts of terror continue to fill Western media's hard copy and airwaves.

In my opinion, there are two schools of those who continue to defend those who perpetuate acts of horror in this world. First, there are those individuals who truly believe, on an emotional level, that Islamic terrorists and related thugs, are just political activists. Blaming the victim -- the Israeli, the American -- is the order of the day -- an act these so-called defenders of the downtrodden and underdog would find abhorrent if the victim were, for example, a woman raped by a criminal. The politics of the day determines who is characterized as the victim -- therefore, for those who defend Hamas and Hezbollah, Israelis, Jews, Americans, can never be the victim, but are the perpetrators.

The second group is comprised of those leaders, politicians, and media who do what is expedient from their point of view. Commenter Octavio Johanson writes, "I don't know how American and European politicians sleep at night when they are doing business with Hamas and similar organizations." Sadly, Mr. Johanson, as we continue to see what unfolds with the Oil-For-Food scandal, a conscience is not something we should expect of many politicians and diplomats. Power and money drives those who would sleep with the devil to advance their own agenda.

Mr. Crooke, and the people who associate with him, frighten me as much as the Islamic terrorists themselves.
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (26) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Jokes are good [45 words]Elsi VacanoJan 12, 2007 20:5872591
Too long...Give a break!! [279 words]Harish RamaswamyDec 1, 2006 01:0567926
2Reason trumps Emotion (Unless you're a fanatic...) [1377 words]usesomelogicJun 8, 2006 14:5247294
alastair Crook et.al. [110 words]Simon WatneyJun 5, 2006 04:1047083
The EU and Hamas [110 words]Daniel MeturganMay 5, 2005 15:4722005
Good Grief! [353 words]BruceApr 26, 2005 13:2321828
Reply to Bruce [86 words]Seamus MacNemiSep 12, 2007 00:0821828
Maybe It Has Something to Do With Their "Public" Schools [44 words]JakeApr 23, 2005 10:0321778
Reply to Jake [91 words]Seamus MacNemiSep 12, 2007 00:2921778
Relativism [106 words]Octavio JohansonApr 21, 2005 18:5521760
Muslim hatred [219 words]Dan KatcherApr 21, 2005 15:1421759
You said it RIGHT! Thank you! [348 words]DonnaJan 30, 2007 02:3321759
Megalomania [70 words]Gaspar TociApr 21, 2008 23:4621759
Details & omissions [334 words]CApr 21, 2005 11:3221755
Crookes hamas pals - the new nazis and their ally [345 words]Rob KleinApr 21, 2005 10:0821753
Hamazis: an apt title. [50 words]Richard L. KocherFeb 19, 2006 09:5221753
What is Islam's Nature? [114 words]Timothy B. RobertsApr 21, 2005 00:1121751
Tolerance of intolerance? [57 words]L DixonMar 30, 2008 10:0521751
Diplomacy and Terrorism [105 words]JohnApr 20, 2005 21:2721750
Wishful thinking [56 words]Bernard ArkulesApr 20, 2005 17:0621743
Let us go back to basics [189 words]Octavio JohansonApr 20, 2005 14:4321741
Alastair Crooke - a coincidence? [30 words]Peggy KazApr 20, 2005 14:1421740
Reply to Peggy Kaz [53 words]Seamus MacNemiSep 12, 2007 00:4921740
Our Man in the Trenches [182 words]Dave M. O'NeillApr 20, 2005 12:1221739
Muslims do not hate our values. They hate our policies. [95 words]PatApr 20, 2005 12:1121738
Sharing Jokes with Hamas [13 words]Herb StoneApr 20, 2005 10:5521737

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)