Submitted by C (United States), Apr 21, 2005 at 11:32
Thank you, Dr. Pipes. for writing another important column to help the citizens of the world read between the lines of the usual apologia for terrorism. The omissions from most newspaper articles, as the details you have described of the meetings Crooke et al. have had, are as frightening as the blatant "spin" in favor of those who wish to use unspeakable violence to advance their "cause." There continues to be a standard of relativism perpetuated by too many "leaders" and writers: who the victims are will determine how the story is reported. Attempts to minimize the immorality of acts of terror continue to fill Western media's hard copy and airwaves.
In my opinion, there are two schools of those who continue to defend those who perpetuate acts of horror in this world. First, there are those individuals who truly believe, on an emotional level, that Islamic terrorists and related thugs, are just political activists. Blaming the victim -- the Israeli, the American -- is the order of the day -- an act these so-called defenders of the downtrodden and underdog would find abhorrent if the victim were, for example, a woman raped by a criminal. The politics of the day determines who is characterized as the victim -- therefore, for those who defend Hamas and Hezbollah, Israelis, Jews, Americans, can never be the victim, but are the perpetrators.
The second group is comprised of those leaders, politicians, and media who do what is expedient from their point of view. Commenter Octavio Johanson writes, "I don't know how American and European politicians sleep at night when they are doing business with Hamas and similar organizations." Sadly, Mr. Johanson, as we continue to see what unfolds with the Oil-For-Food scandal, a conscience is not something we should expect of many politicians and diplomats. Power and money drives those who would sleep with the devil to advance their own agenda.
Mr. Crooke, and the people who associate with him, frighten me as much as the Islamic terrorists themselves.
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.
| Title |
By |
Date |
| Jokes are good [45 words] | Elsi Vacano | Jan 12, 2007 20:58 |
| Too long...Give a break!! [279 words] | Harish Ramaswamy | Dec 1, 2006 01:05 |
| Reason trumps Emotion (Unless you're a fanatic...) [1377 words] | usesomelogic | Jun 8, 2006 14:52 |
| alastair Crook et.al. [110 words] | Simon Watney | Jun 5, 2006 04:10 |
| The EU and Hamas [110 words] | Daniel Meturgan | May 5, 2005 15:47 |
| Good Grief! [353 words] | Bruce | Apr 26, 2005 13:23 |
| ↔ Reply to Bruce [86 words] | Seamus MacNemi | Sep 12, 2007 00:08 |
| Maybe It Has Something to Do With Their "Public" Schools [44 words] | Jake | Apr 23, 2005 10:03 |
| ↔ Reply to Jake [91 words] | Seamus MacNemi | Sep 12, 2007 00:29 |
| Relativism [106 words] | Octavio Johanson | Apr 21, 2005 18:55 |
| Muslim hatred [219 words] | Dan Katcher | Apr 21, 2005 15:14 |
| ↔ You said it RIGHT! Thank you! [348 words] | Donna | Jan 30, 2007 02:33 |
| ↔ Megalomania [70 words] | Gaspar Toci | Apr 21, 2008 23:46 |
| ⇒ Details & omissions [334 words] | C | Apr 21, 2005 11:32 |
| Crookes hamas pals - the new nazis and their ally [345 words] | Rob Klein | Apr 21, 2005 10:08 |
| ↔ Hamazis: an apt title. [50 words] | Richard L. Kocher | Feb 19, 2006 09:52 |
| What is Islam's Nature? [114 words] | Timothy B. Roberts | Apr 21, 2005 00:11 |
| ↔ Tolerance of intolerance? [57 words] | L Dixon | Mar 30, 2008 10:05 |
| Diplomacy and Terrorism [105 words] | John | Apr 20, 2005 21:27 |
| Wishful thinking [56 words] | Bernard Arkules | Apr 20, 2005 17:06 |
| Let us go back to basics [189 words] | Octavio Johanson | Apr 20, 2005 14:43 |
| Alastair Crooke - a coincidence? [30 words] | Peggy Kaz | Apr 20, 2005 14:14 |
| ↔ Reply to Peggy Kaz [53 words] | Seamus MacNemi | Sep 12, 2007 00:49 |
| Our Man in the Trenches [182 words] | Dave M. O'Neill | Apr 20, 2005 12:12 |
| Muslims do not hate our values. They hate our policies. [95 words] | Pat | Apr 20, 2005 12:11 |
| Sharing Jokes with Hamas [13 words] | Herb Stone | Apr 20, 2005 10:55 |