Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Let us go back to basics
Reader comment on item: [Alastair Crooke's Conflict Forum and] Sharing Jokes with Hamas

Submitted by Octavio Johanson (Italy), Apr 20, 2005 at 14:43

Going back to basics is an expression I have borrowed from religion. In religion, any religion, it means going back to the fundamentals or basic principles of the faith.

In a non-religious context, it means going back to the basic principles of morality and the difference between right and wrong.

To me, "sharing jokes with Hamas" is morally wrong, because what Hamas does is morally wrong.

Therefore, no Western government shall do business with Hamas or any Islamic organisation, because their actions are morally wrong and should not be endorsed.

A country or a part of the world, the West, which has lost sight of the difference betweem moral and immoral is going to lose its influence.

The mere idea of doing business with Hamas or any other Islamic organization is morally wrong, because Hamas and other Islamic organizations kill people.

I don't know how American and European politicians sleep at night when they are doing busines with Hamas and similar organizations.

Sometimes, it is not about delivering sophisticated explanations as Daniel Pipes or Samuel P. Huntinghton do.

It is about avoiding the relativism which is killing the West.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (26) on this item

Title By Date
Jokes are good [45 words]Elsi VacanoJan 12, 2007 20:58
Too long...Give a break!! [279 words]Harish RamaswamyDec 1, 2006 01:05
Reason trumps Emotion (Unless you're a fanatic...) [1377 words]usesomelogicJun 8, 2006 14:52
alastair Crook et.al. [110 words]Simon WatneyJun 5, 2006 04:10
The EU and Hamas [110 words]Daniel MeturganMay 5, 2005 15:47
Good Grief! [353 words]BruceApr 26, 2005 13:23
Reply to Bruce [86 words]Seamus MacNemiSep 12, 2007 00:08
Maybe It Has Something to Do With Their "Public" Schools [44 words]JakeApr 23, 2005 10:03
Reply to Jake [91 words]Seamus MacNemiSep 12, 2007 00:29
Relativism [106 words]Octavio JohansonApr 21, 2005 18:55
Muslim hatred [219 words]Dan KatcherApr 21, 2005 15:14
You said it RIGHT! Thank you! [348 words]DonnaJan 30, 2007 02:33
Megalomania [70 words]Gaspar TociApr 21, 2008 23:46
Details & omissions [334 words]CApr 21, 2005 11:32
Crookes hamas pals - the new nazis and their ally [345 words]Rob KleinApr 21, 2005 10:08
Hamazis: an apt title. [50 words]Richard L. KocherFeb 19, 2006 09:52
What is Islam's Nature? [114 words]Timothy B. RobertsApr 21, 2005 00:11
Tolerance of intolerance? [57 words]L DixonMar 30, 2008 10:05
Diplomacy and Terrorism [105 words]JohnApr 20, 2005 21:27
Wishful thinking [56 words]Bernard ArkulesApr 20, 2005 17:06
⇒ Let us go back to basics [189 words]Octavio JohansonApr 20, 2005 14:43
Alastair Crooke - a coincidence? [30 words]Peggy KazApr 20, 2005 14:14
Reply to Peggy Kaz [53 words]Seamus MacNemiSep 12, 2007 00:49
Our Man in the Trenches [182 words]Dave M. O'NeillApr 20, 2005 12:12
Muslims do not hate our values. They hate our policies. [95 words]PatApr 20, 2005 12:11
Sharing Jokes with Hamas [13 words]Herb StoneApr 20, 2005 10:55

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page