1 readers online now  |  69 million page views

requested examples

Reader comment on item: Why Newt Gingrich Was Right about Palestinian History
in response to reader comment: A pot calls the kettle black

Submitted by the Grand Infidel of Kaffiristan (Australia), Dec 27, 2011 at 23:10

Amin Riaz responds to points made by GIK:

GIK : "....For a person who claims to be born in England - Mr Riaz continually demonstares poor grammatical skills. Typos can be forgiven (I'm as guilty as anyone on that front) - but the repeated absence of the indefinite and definite articles and many other faux pas point to maybe a lack of education , a good education but with poor teachers, living amongst a group of people with similar poor habits or actually not having English as a first language."

AR: "....Yet you did not give one example! And here wasted time on petty personal insult. As repeatedly those who cannot answer the actual matter that is being discussed ... but waste time on such trifles."

Mr Riaz is correct - no examples were supplied. Of course if someone refuses to believe an assertion - not giving examples is a mistake.

Some examples of very poor grammar taken from just a few responses by Mr A.R. in in the current thread (suggested corrections in italics):

"This is the reason Israel will never accept 2 state solution"

"This is the reason Israel will never accept a (or 'the') 2 state solution"

Romans destroyed it long long long time ago.

Romans destroyed it a long , long , long time ago

And because of that the Arabs that have lived in territory known as Palestine

And because of that the Arabs that have lived in the territory known as Palestine

He has repeatedly lied over such simple thing as word in a dictionary.

He has repeatedly lied over such a simple thing as a word in a dictionary.

DHIMMI HAS LONG LONG LIST

Dhimmi has a long, long list

To this day he repeats it wrong .

To this day he repeats it incorrectly.

Anyone who is going to present criticism of literature it is expected they ADAVNCED skills.

If anyone is going to present criticism of literature it is expected that they have advanced skills.

He does not even know the difference between Verb Its Object and Subject.

He does not even know the difference between a verb's object and subject.

.....like Wansbrough were against the view that there are grammar mistakes in the Quran.

like Wansbrough were against the view that there are grammatical mistakes in the Quran.

Sorry ... its is their language

Sorry ... it's their language

He has yet to say where and with whom has he learned Arabic.

He has yet to say where and with whom he has learned Arabic.

I can prove all - very very easy and is not even aware of basics of Arabic

I can prove all very, very easily and he is not even aware of the basics of Arabic.

Mr. A.R: "...Yet you did not give one example!"

It stopped there for the sake of brevity - not because of any lack of examples.

MR Amin's other posts are littered with similar examples of extremely poor grammar. So which is it - a lack of education , a good education but with poor teachers, living amongst a group of people with similar poor habits or actually not having English as a first language?

The examples given show fundamental errors of grammar and would tend to indicate the latter.

GIK wrote:

"...Aside from this minor point - Dhimmi's arabic language skills clearly surpass Mr Riaz's. Would Mr Riaz agree? This has been demonstrated time and time again in response to muslims on this blog whose first language is arabic."

A.R. responds: "....You criticised my language skills ... but look at the above. Pot calling kettle black?"

GIK criticised A.R.'s ENGLISH language skills. It is yet to be proven whether A.R. has any Arabic language skills.

A.R. writes: " Dhimmi has NO Arabic skills.."

That statement is clearly false.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to requested examples by the Grand Infidel of Kaffiristan

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List
eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2021 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)