67 readers online now

98,582 comments by 26,202 readers

Go to Mobile Site

Latest Articles

 

ADVERTISEMENTS



Premium Links
by Wikio

Computers
Electronics
Communication
Appliances

eXTReMe Tracker

Has Bush got the name right?
Reader comment on item: [President Bush and] Naming the Enemy

Submitted by Anthony Chase (United States), Aug 17, 2004 at 05:03

I agree with the sentiment behind your comments on George Bush's most recent effort to name the opponent in the war on terrorism. But I am surprised you do not see his most recent effort - the long and awkward and ambiguous reference being played on comedy shows like John Stewart's - as a step backwards, rather than a step forward.

Don't you think that Bush has seized upon the the reference in the 9/11 Report to "ideology" as a way of AVOIDING mentioning RELIGION? The truth is that much of the Arab world to the contrary notwithstanding, the United States is NOT engaged in a war on Islam. The US is only at war with that portion of Islam which, well, frankly, rejects the separation of church and state. That is a sticky proposition for Bush since his core political constituency in this country includes Americans who, similarly, reject the separation of church and state.

Thus Bush has spent several years trying to ESCAPE any reference to Islamic terrorists as ISLAMIC terrorists. This point is made in THE AGE OF SACRED TERROR, IMPERIAL HUBRIS, Tommy Franks' book, the 9/11 Report, and so forth. Under Bush's current definition of the enemy, most of the world outside of Europe and the U.S. falls within our sights. Americans know better and you should too.

Consider one last observation: the gap between Israel's definition of the enemy and ours is enormous. Why should that be so? I think the Israelis are on the right track...

Tony Chase

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (28) on this item

Title By Date
do muslims and islamists follow a different doctrine? [93 words]XavierNov 4, 2005 06:42
Aren't Islamists true Muslims according to the Koran?
[w/response] [467 words]
William KarkowAug 29, 2004 20:10
Must expose the brutality [104 words]S.C.PandaAug 25, 2004 06:16
"Does President Bush Really Get It Yet?" [262 words]Ms Judy KeckAug 24, 2004 21:15
Ideological war [65 words]D. ConnellAug 24, 2004 09:19
Islamo-fascism [61 words]Prof. Victor DanushevskyAug 23, 2004 22:36
Identifying Enemies of Democracy [16 words]John Randall PeacherAug 23, 2004 04:08
U.N. Role [54 words]F. WexAug 22, 2004 17:47
Fellow travellers [242 words]David and Valerea ThomasAug 21, 2004 00:03
Another related enemy [117 words]John P ReynoldsAug 20, 2004 22:14
Where are they? [45 words]Frank van DeventerAug 20, 2004 17:33
Words [147 words]William StenwickAug 20, 2004 13:51
The Awakenig [139 words]R MckeeAug 20, 2004 12:08
ISLAMISTS [76 words]jaime eisenAug 20, 2004 08:39
It's About Time [180 words]Carl BossieuxAug 19, 2004 13:34
Very nice article [53 words]BernardzAug 18, 2004 02:41
Huntington was right the first time! [197 words]Mike LallatinAug 17, 2004 20:53
The truth of Islamic Fascism [526 words]Arlinda DeAngelisAug 17, 2004 19:48
Murderers [36 words]F.B.WexelbaumAug 17, 2004 14:59
Naming the Enemy [219 words]Geoff GAug 17, 2004 12:44
The Term Islamist - Is It the Issue? [172 words]Ira KatzAug 17, 2004 12:14
Defining the enemy [289 words]Allen WeingartenAug 17, 2004 12:09
Political correctness is tying our hands [68 words]SaeelAug 17, 2004 11:19
What's in a "Name!" [214 words]M RothchildAug 17, 2004 09:38
Religion is antithetical to life as a human. [72 words]Ralph C. Whaley MDAug 17, 2004 08:35
Importance of your work [91 words]Flora SteinmanAug 17, 2004 07:52
Not extremists and not fringe [83 words]Moshe DarAug 17, 2004 05:18
⇒ Has Bush got the name right? [253 words]Anthony ChaseAug 17, 2004 05:03

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

ADVERTISEMENTS

All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © Daniel Pipes. Email: meqmef@aol.com