3 readers online now  |  69 million page views

US policy toward Israel is perfectly consistent

Reader comment on item: U.S. to Israel: You Decide Nukes in Iran, We Decide Bedrooms in Jerusalem

Submitted by Fay Voshell (United States), Jul 12, 2009 at 12:50

Actually, the Obama administration is perfectly consistent in its policies toward Israel. Israel has been completely downgraded as an ally in order to curry favor wth the Arab world.

Warmer relations with Arab nations will be achieved by leaving Israel's security entirely in its own hands; that is, the US will not help Israel in any military raid on Iranian nuclear facilities. This policy surely sends a chill down the spine of the Israeli government, for it is tacitly implied that no obligations to the state of Israel will be honored should Israel use a military option against Iran or should Iran use the military option against Israel. Also, it virtually assures no action will be taken by the US in order to stop Iran from acquiring nukes. The result is paralysis of Israel's Iranian policy; and, it follows, of her security.

Second, the emphasis on halting growth of settlements in the West Bank and the Eastern part of Jerusalem are aimed at paralyzing Israel's domestic policies, as the large hint from the US is that it now supports partitioning of Jerusalem as well as the eventual return of West bank, both of actions will further weaken Israel.

So it can be plainly said that the ultimate aim of the Obama administration's policy is a weakened Israel. Once she is eviscerated in international and national affairs, and once the Arab world sees the US has no intention of defending her, she will be seen as easier prey for her enemies to devour.

In the meantime, the Obama administration, as is its wont, will continue to put out red herrings to mislead Israel and American Jews into thinking he is really on Israel's side. An example of his distractions include declamations reviling holocaust deniers and talking about Israel's sovereign right to defend herself while all the while ensuring she is weakened both domestically and internationally so the Arab world, which Obama's real politik sees as far more significant, may have ascendancy.

Fay Voshell


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submitting....

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (33) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
The Israelis are taking only a minute portion of what is theirs! [118 words]Jay DuncanMar 30, 2010 01:11170762
Hussein Obama struggles not to deal with Iran untill his mandate is over- so the culpabitility will fall upon others. [78 words]YnnatchkahJul 27, 2009 15:00159350
The New Nuclear Cold War [170 words]Stepehn HughesJul 23, 2009 00:36159183
Israel , and Israel alone should decide how she will survive ! [84 words]Phil GreendJul 19, 2009 03:13159004
Best interest of whom? [18 words]JohnJul 16, 2009 19:24158926
I believe that in the interest of consistency we should order Israel to surrender it's nuclear arsenal. [27 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
GreywulfJul 16, 2009 09:43158913
Weakening Israel [342 words]Fay VoshellJul 14, 2009 11:07158837
Whiny Petulance [108 words]danJul 14, 2009 05:18158826
No difference at all [119 words]Lars NielsenJul 13, 2009 17:22158810
US policy toward Israel is perfectly consistent [332 words]Fay VoshellJul 12, 2009 12:50158780
Ms Voshell is right, but the question is consistent with what ? [245 words]JonJul 15, 2009 06:47158780
Theolgical/political logistics [369 words]Fay VoshellJul 17, 2009 09:47158780
Politics and theology in Iran [313 words]JonJul 21, 2009 17:14158780
Wny an Iranian/Israeli alliance won't happen [394 words]Fay VoshellJul 28, 2009 11:46158780
Fayad, Palestine and the jews. [26 words]stevenLJul 9, 2009 22:27158704
inconsistency [70 words]miriamJul 9, 2009 19:16158699
Mixed messages from Obama adm. officials causing a lot of hot-air. [16 words]M.D.Jul 9, 2009 17:47158692
Foolish preference [79 words]R.S. DavisJul 9, 2009 10:30158662
Green Light means go [120 words]AntiochosJul 9, 2009 09:55158660
no inconsistency [150 words]Pete murrayJul 9, 2009 06:34158652
Yea old double standard ! [123 words]Lou from Queens, NYC, USAJul 9, 2009 00:21158642
Sovereign or Not [128 words]Gilles and Elinore MailhiotJul 8, 2009 19:42158634
US To Israel: You decide Nukes in Iran. We decide bedrooms in Jerusalem. [127 words]DebbieJul 8, 2009 18:20158625
Israel as a vassal state of the US [114 words]Regina DalyJul 8, 2009 15:16158624
Agreed [66 words]Abu NudnikJul 8, 2009 13:21158621
So Israel is being asked/tasked to do the US's dirty work in Iran [664 words]JonJul 8, 2009 12:43158617
Israel's independence [73 words]J. SheffJul 8, 2009 12:37158616
Further elaboration, please [86 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Sheryl RosenbergJul 8, 2009 11:28158613
Iran and her nukes program and no new Israeli settlements [163 words]IsaacJul 8, 2009 11:27158612
Obama's Hectoring & What It Portends For Israel [202 words]Adina KutnickiJul 8, 2009 09:46158608
What's good for the goose, etc. [141 words]Rebecca MouldsJul 8, 2009 09:32158607
Bingo [93 words]Yuval Brandstetter MDJul 8, 2009 01:36158591
Mr. Obama's attitude along with Hillary's one. [140 words]SvetlanaJul 7, 2009 23:14158589

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to US policy toward Israel is perfectly consistent by Fay Voshell

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

ADVERTISEMENTS

eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2019 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)