Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

What the Philadelphia City Paper didn't write
Reader comment on item: Pipes' Dreams

Submitted by Karl Ericson (United States), Jul 26, 2002 at 17:09

Dear Sir:

Daniel Brook in his article "Pipe's Dreams" wrote that Daniel Pipes is in the grips of a conspiracy theory that the Muslims want to take over America. I can't believe Dr. Pipes could be so delusional, why that's almost as crazy as a conspiracy theory that Muslims were planning to fly airplanes into the World Trade Center. Wait a minute, that happened!

Daniel Brook wrote: "Muslim leaders say that Pipes uses the false dichotomy of militant Islam and moderate Islam to eschew charges of racism." Are these Muslim leaders saying there is no such dichotomy? That is very alarming when one considers the words of Ayatollah Khomeini who said: "Islam makes it incumbent on all adult males, provided they are not disabled and incapacitated, to prepare themselves for the conquest of other [countries] so that the writ of Islam is obeyed in every country in the world. But those who study Islamic Holy War will understand why Islam wants to conquer the whole world...Those who know nothing of Islam pretend that Islam counsels against war. Those [who say this] are witless. " I certainly hope Mr. Pipes is right and there is a dichotomy but I have to believe the Muslim leaders on this one.

We don't have to worry though, Ayatollah Khomeini was a special case, right?

In the 1920s the first Islamic missionaries who arrived in America in the 1920s declared: "Our plan is that we are going to conquer America."

So a few crazy Muslim missionaries in the 1920s said that, that doesn't mean all Muslims want to conquer America, right?

The late Ismail Al-Faruqi, a Palestinian immigrant who founded the International Institute of Islamic Thought and taught for many years at Temple University in Philadelphia wrote that: "Nothing could be greater than this youthful, vigorous, and rich continent [of North America] turning away from its past evil and marching forward under the banner of Allahu Akbar [God is great]".

So, a professor at Temple said that. Professors are an odd lot anyway, right?

Siraj Wahaj, a black convert to Islam and the recipient of some of the American Muslim community's highest honors, addressed an audience of New Jersey Muslims in 2002 in which he told his New Jersey listeners, they could take over the United States and replace its constitutional government with a caliphate. He said "If we were united and strong, we'd elect our own emir [leader] and give allegiance to him...Take my word, if 6-8 million Muslims unite in America, the country will come to us."

I'd worry except that Ibrahim Hooper, spokesman for the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), says that his group only seeks "justice and accommodation for the Islamic-American community so we can practice our faith in a multiethnic setting."

Wasn't it Mr. Hooper who said in 1993 that: "I wouldn't want to create the impression that I wouldn't like the government of the United States to be Islamic sometime in the future." Wasn't it CAIR Chairman Omar M. Ahmad who told a crowd of California Muslims in July 1998, "Islam isn't in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Koran . . . should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on earth."

I think I need a psychiatrist.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (28) on this item

Title By Date
I'm A Muslim [455 words]F BFeb 14, 2006 15:21
Islam Always Right [111 words]SamJun 23, 2005 02:11
Pipes is Right On [135 words]Dolce H. FarnienteSep 15, 2002 15:30
9/11 ensured that Islamist takeover of U.S. will never fly [248 words]Joshua TruaxSep 15, 2002 00:48
How to win. [24 words]BobSep 12, 2002 16:30
What Hijab? [353 words]MohamedSep 12, 2002 06:26
not to wear hijab [53 words]emmaFeb 13, 2007 10:45
Hijab is commanded by Allah not tradition [130 words]sister in IslamFeb 13, 2008 12:38
I feel for you [78 words]EmanApr 6, 2008 01:11
⇒ What the Philadelphia City Paper didn't write [552 words]Karl EricsonJul 26, 2002 17:09
Hijab for police officer- beginning of Islamization? [227 words]Athena 1040Jul 21, 2002 22:47
SO WHAT? [124 words]GhazalMay 4, 2008 03:49
a choice [75 words]zeinaJun 6, 2008 14:20
Saudi passport ID/ photos [53 words]L. MorganJul 21, 2002 06:55
driving [104 words]Ahmed AlharthyJun 25, 2008 05:49
Saudi women do show their face in ID [22 words]SandyAug 31, 2009 17:47
How are we going to win? [94 words]NanciJul 21, 2002 05:06
Daniel Pipes: Scholar, Not Prophet [312 words]David M DastychJul 20, 2002 15:30
We must have some rules [168 words]Arthur FerrisJul 20, 2002 08:12
There is a point of no return [25 words]Gene BiegelJul 19, 2002 22:10
Ibrahim Hooper - start in Saudi Arabia [205 words]John Randall PeacherJul 19, 2002 19:53
Saudi Arabia's Role in Terrorism [21 words]Jerome RothalJul 19, 2002 17:12
Cofirming Pipes' Views [329 words]Joyena AbrahamJul 19, 2002 16:09
How Many More Lives Must Be Lost Before We "Learn" [142 words]Rusty RivetJul 19, 2002 15:35
Islamist lady drive a car? [35 words]MelvinJul 19, 2002 13:14
Keep that perspective coming, Daniel Pipes [201 words]Dush RamachandranJul 19, 2002 12:58
A Fringe Phenomenon? [126 words]Dr. Richard BenkinJul 19, 2002 12:19
Muslims running for political office [28 words]David CottunJul 19, 2002 12:03

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page