Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Treason Defined
Reader comment on item: None Dare Call It Treason... 25 Years Later
in response to reader comment: conspiracy, sedition, and treason defined

Submitted by Truth.Teller (United States), Feb 23, 2008 at 22:32

Treason is defined by the Constitution:

"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court."

This is a very strict definition. It does not apply to ordinary political differences, though the charge of "giving aid and comfort to the enemy" is frequently raised. It further requires an overt act and two witnesses. Treason is any easy charge to make, but a difficult one to prove.

Few people have ever been convicted of treason. Aaron Burr was acquitted in 1807, despite the strong efforts of Thomas Jefferson, owing to the lack of two witnesses. No supporter of the Confederate States of America was convicted of treason after the war. Spies such as Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were charged with espionage rather than treason. John Walker Lindh, the "American Taliban," was convicted of conspiracy to commit murder, but not treason. The last person convicted of treason in the U.S. was Tomoya Kawakita, an American-born man who had moved to Japan and aided the Japanese war effort. He was convicted in 1952.

As for accusing someone of treason because of his position on inflation, I would call that un-American. Americans tolerate a diversity of political views, which is what distinguishes a democratic society from a tryranny, such as Communism.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (23) on this item

Title By Date
conspiracy, sedition, and treason defined [570 words]onesimusJan 13, 2008 11:46
⇒ Treason Defined [246 words]Truth.TellerFeb 23, 2008 22:32
History has proven..sadly ,,that the JBS is right all along.. [122 words]Nino BaldinoDec 2, 2008 16:04
John Perkins vis None dare.... [18 words]T.M. HartDec 5, 2008 11:37
So this is how democracy ends........ [16 words]J. FreemanMar 7, 2009 22:58
"100% Correct"? [91 words]Ernie LazarMar 27, 2009 10:10
Onesimus Comments [171 words]Ernie LazarMar 27, 2009 10:18
A Bit Off the Mark, but Just a Bit [59 words]Long Time ConservativeDec 20, 2007 16:26
it all stacks up [61 words]paulDec 9, 2007 05:25
None Dare Call It Treason - how many sold? [54 words]AileenNov 7, 2007 14:18
None Dare Call It Treason [28 words]justin wizardOct 13, 2007 14:35
It still goes on [119 words]Ted GriffinMay 28, 2007 07:45
I have this book [117 words]JonOct 16, 2007 06:45
I read the original in the 60's [98 words]Dave in TexasNov 30, 2007 12:47
FBI Evaluation of Birch Society Arguments [288 words]ernieNov 9, 2006 16:59
I recall None Dare Call it Treason [232 words]PhilNov 18, 2005 20:54
Jury still out? [451 words]FrankJan 30, 2006 15:10
Follow-up... as promised [870 words]FrankFeb 15, 2006 12:35
Liberalism [141 words]Robert FultonFeb 18, 2006 00:31
follow the money, you will know the truth.... [313 words]warren baconApr 16, 2006 10:06
Greed is the root of treason [13 words]marilyn huntOct 7, 2006 19:49
Marilyn Hunt has it backwards [55 words]Jake RobertsOct 3, 2007 10:37
Very good analysis [106 words]ChampSep 11, 2009 04:31

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page