Submitted by warren bacon (United States), Apr 16, 2006 at 10:06
the american taxpayer has, for the past 75 years, been played for a sap. we have financed everything from the recovery of an ungrateful europe to a resurgent, dangerous, china. do any of you know just how much of your hard earned money goes to support the lifestyles of despots around the world? the amount is atonishing.
the same united nations that hates our guts has no problem swilling down taxpayer funded caviar and dom perignon at office parties all across manhatten, at mr and mrs america's expense. from the end of ww2, korea, vietnam, all the wrong moves seemingly made from good intentions. ever wonder why all of a sudden the price of a gallon of gas has almost tripled? ask mr bush's good friends the saudis, who suddenly decided to divert 30 per cent of our alloted supply to russia and china, her new found friends in the region.
guess keeping the royals safe from bin laden and his ilk wasn't enough to ensure their loyalty. how about our open borders and unenforced immigration program, by our elected officials who continue defy the will of 80 per cent of all americans, minus the 12 million lawbreakers of course. now we hear the clintons may have unknowingly helped the iranians with their nuclear program. why not, bill and hillary had no problem giving away the farm to china and russia, who in turn aided pakistan, north korea, and india, in obtaing their nuclear weapons.
sadly, this nation is finished. sooner than most of you realize. this summer we will witness the start of world war three. seems the russians have "lost" 250 of their tactical nuclear missiles. by coincidence, the new iranian ballistic missile is designed to carry such a warhead. anybody out there ever put a puzzle together? doesn't take a columbo to know that it all just doesn't add up.
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.
| Title |
By |
Date |
| conspiracy, sedition, and treason defined [570 words] | onesimus | Jan 13, 2008 11:46 |
| ↔ Treason Defined [246 words] | Truth.Teller | Feb 23, 2008 22:32 |
| ↔ History has proven..sadly ,,that the JBS is right all along.. [122 words] | Nino Baldino | Dec 2, 2008 16:04 |
| ↔ John Perkins vis None dare.... [18 words] | T.M. Hart | Dec 5, 2008 11:37 |
| ↔ So this is how democracy ends........ [16 words] | J. Freeman | Mar 7, 2009 22:58 |
| ↔ "100% Correct"? [91 words] | Ernie Lazar | Mar 27, 2009 10:10 |
| ↔ Onesimus Comments [171 words] | Ernie Lazar | Mar 27, 2009 10:18 |
| A Bit Off the Mark, but Just a Bit [59 words] | Long Time Conservative | Dec 20, 2007 16:26 |
| it all stacks up [61 words] | paul | Dec 9, 2007 05:25 |
| None Dare Call It Treason - how many sold? [54 words] | Aileen | Nov 7, 2007 14:18 |
| None Dare Call It Treason [28 words] | justin wizard | Oct 13, 2007 14:35 |
| It still goes on [119 words] | Ted Griffin | May 28, 2007 07:45 |
| ↔ I have this book [117 words] | Jon | Oct 16, 2007 06:45 |
| ↔ I read the original in the 60's [98 words] | Dave in Texas | Nov 30, 2007 12:47 |
| FBI Evaluation of Birch Society Arguments [288 words] | ernie | Nov 9, 2006 16:59 |
| I recall None Dare Call it Treason [232 words] | Phil | Nov 18, 2005 20:54 |
| ↔ Jury still out? [451 words] | Frank | Jan 30, 2006 15:10 |
| ↔ Follow-up... as promised [870 words] | Frank | Feb 15, 2006 12:35 |
| ↔ Liberalism [141 words] | Robert Fulton | Feb 18, 2006 00:31 |
| ↔ ⇒ follow the money, you will know the truth.... [313 words] | warren bacon | Apr 16, 2006 10:06 |
| ↔ Greed is the root of treason [13 words] | marilyn hunt | Oct 7, 2006 19:49 |
| ↔ Marilyn Hunt has it backwards [55 words] | Jake Roberts | Oct 3, 2007 10:37 |
| ↔ Very good analysis [106 words] | Champ | Sep 11, 2009 04:31 |