| Daniel Pipes Mobile Edition Regular Site |
|
| Home | Articles | Blog | Reviews | Search | |
Submitted by ira levine (United States), Oct 22, 2007 at 11:16
Mr. Pipes:
here is the response that I received from Ray Hanania. Note that Mr. Hanania did not provide any specifics as to how Mr. Pipes and Campus Watch promote religious hatred. Note also how he also deftly changed the parameters of the discussion. I asked for specifics as to how Mr. Pipes promotes religious hatred. He changed the premise from "religious hatred" to one of "extremism." They are different, I think. I also think that it is false that you labeled every Arab or Muslim who criticized Israel as being "extremist." Also, Mr. Hanania did not respond to the charge that writing an article in Arab News was the equivalent of writing for Pravda or Völkischer Beobachter. Anyway, here is his reply:
You are absolutely wrong. I routinely denounce bigots and racists who are Jewish and American AND also denounce bigots and racists who are Muslim. I often condemn the groups that preach anti-Semitism and Holocaust revisionism, and I also denounce Islamic extremism.
But unlike Daniel Pipes who attacks every Muslim and Arab group that criticizes Israel -- he has NEVER spoken positively or praised any Arab or Muslim group that has ever criticized Israel -- I speak out on the basis of ONE PRINCIPLE in defense of Jews, Muslims and Christians ... because to me, the war is not between Israelis and Palestinians, nor between Jews and Arabs. It is between "moderates" and "extremists."
To define onself as a moderate, you must SPEAK OUT againmst Israeli government atrocities against innocent Palestinians as well as denounce fanatic Hamas and Islamic and Arab terrorism that kills innocent Jews. I do that, but do you?
To support Daniel Pipes given his history of vicious assaults against ALL Arabs and Muslims regardless of whether they are moderate or extremist -- and THAT is where Pipes is at fault painting ALL Arabs and ALL Muslims who criticize Israel as extremists.
Thanks for sharing your opinions.
Ray Hanania
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.
| Title | By | Date |
| ⇒ Calumny and Slander - Reply from Hanania [324 words] | ira levine | Oct 22, 2007 11:16 |
| URGENT - COLUMBIA IS ABOUT TO GRANT MASSAD TENURE [64 words] | GARY PAXON | Oct 21, 2007 22:53 |
| ↔ Are you being fair to this professor? [w/response] [171 words] | Valerie Chau | Jun 9, 2008 21:30 |
| Other slanders against Mr. Pipes and Campus Watch [260 words] | ira levine | Oct 21, 2007 17:13 |
| I really did have a Campus Watch spy in my class, Dr. Pipes [w/response] [80 words] | David Faris | May 14, 2007 23:08 |
| ↔ mentality [165 words] | jennifer solis | Oct 20, 2007 16:47 |
| ↔ 65 % against Bush and Campus Watch [282 words] | Ynnatchkah | Oct 21, 2007 04:35 |
| Challenge Critics of Campus Watch [92 words] | Richard H. Shulman | Apr 26, 2006 11:41 |
| Keep up the good work, Campus Watch! [135 words] | concerned | Apr 25, 2006 07:05 |
| Congrats [51 words] | Bill Hylton | Apr 24, 2006 21:48 |
| Restore, Not threaten [46 words] | Darwin Barrett | Apr 23, 2006 21:03 |
| An interesting word. [19 words] | D Wolf | Apr 20, 2006 02:16 |
| I love it [97 words] | Roger | Apr 18, 2006 13:48 |
| ↔ Totally agree with Roger [27 words] | RM | Apr 23, 2006 10:15 |
| Let's look at high schools too [115 words] | Arnie Servais | Apr 18, 2006 10:40 |