65 % against Bush and Campus Watch
Reader comment on item: Backhanded Endorsements of Campus Watch
in response to reader comment: I really did have a Campus Watch spy in my class, Dr. Pipes

Submitted by Ynnatchkah (United States), Oct 21, 2007 at 04:35

A Note in response to what you posted about Campus Watch:

Dear "teacher or not "David Faris:

1.Your statement about belonging to 65 % of Americans that disapprove Bush, sounds to me as a scream of victimhood, as it says in India:

"…The fact that you are the only one that thinks differently (The only one that has a specific opinion), does not mean you are wrong"....

Corollarily speaking, the fact that you belong to 65 % of the population –against Bush, does not mean you are right!

2.Your kind loves to play victim and spread un-truths in order to get time and money to perpetuate the fallacy that your existence/work is vital to humanity.

Not being able to make a life in the competitive/serious market, that's the gateway you found.

3.Pity you belong to the most developed nation in the civilization history, I mean, you were born in the same environment, but if this nation were to depend on you, it would surely be qualified as a fifth world country.

4.As Jennifer Solis very well said: "...You are NOT the center of the Universe"...and,

5.BTW, since you are so "wise", did you check the student's credentials, b/c ultimately, you are harassing others, with- to this very moment- un-founded accusations?

6.And, where you get the number (" 65 ") % from?

7. Conclusion:

The Situation you struggle to defend was set too broadly to deserve ANY merit under the scientific scope.

But do not worry, whenever you hit your faces in the immediate above argument, you best expression of childshish comes as follows:

"Everyone is entitled to his/her opinion, and that's my opinion."....

That's your proxy for defense.

How deplorable!

Regards,

Ynnatchkah

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.