1 readers online now  |  69 million page views

65 % against Bush and Campus Watch

Reader comment on item: Backhanded Endorsements of Campus Watch
in response to reader comment: I really did have a Campus Watch spy in my class, Dr. Pipes

Submitted by Ynnatchkah (United States), Oct 21, 2007 at 04:35

A Note in response to what you posted about Campus Watch:

Dear "teacher or not "David Faris:

1.Your statement about belonging to 65 % of Americans that disapprove Bush, sounds to me as a scream of victimhood, as it says in India:

"…The fact that you are the only one that thinks differently (The only one that has a specific opinion), does not mean you are wrong"....

Corollarily speaking, the fact that you belong to 65 % of the population –against Bush, does not mean you are right!

2.Your kind loves to play victim and spread un-truths in order to get time and money to perpetuate the fallacy that your existence/work is vital to humanity.

Not being able to make a life in the competitive/serious market, that's the gateway you found.

3.Pity you belong to the most developed nation in the civilization history, I mean, you were born in the same environment, but if this nation were to depend on you, it would surely be qualified as a fifth world country.

4.As Jennifer Solis very well said: "...You are NOT the center of the Universe"...and,

5.BTW, since you are so "wise", did you check the student's credentials, b/c ultimately, you are harassing others, with- to this very moment- un-founded accusations?

6.And, where you get the number (" 65 ") % from?

7. Conclusion:

The Situation you struggle to defend was set too broadly to deserve ANY merit under the scientific scope.

But do not worry, whenever you hit your faces in the immediate above argument, you best expression of childshish comes as follows:

"Everyone is entitled to his/her opinion, and that's my opinion."....

That's your proxy for defense.

How deplorable!

Regards,

Ynnatchkah

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (18) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Ten Thousand. [26 words]AlbertE.Sep 18, 2019 22:07254717
2The Prof suffers from Trump Derangement Syndrome! Really bad! [226 words]dhimmi no moreOct 7, 2018 12:07245273
Good news, Dr. Pipes [73 words]JeffSep 27, 2016 13:26233039
Calumny and Slander - Reply from Hanania [324 words]ira levineOct 22, 2007 11:16112131
URGENT - COLUMBIA IS ABOUT TO GRANT MASSAD TENURE [64 words]GARY PAXONOct 21, 2007 22:53112117
Are you being fair to this professor? [171 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Valerie ChauJun 9, 2008 21:30112117
Other slanders against Mr. Pipes and Campus Watch [260 words]ira levineOct 21, 2007 17:13112107
I really did have a Campus Watch spy in my class, Dr. Pipes [80 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
David FarisMay 14, 2007 23:0892925
mentality [165 words]jennifer solisOct 20, 2007 16:4792925
65 % against Bush and Campus Watch [282 words]YnnatchkahOct 21, 2007 04:3592925
Challenge Critics of Campus Watch [92 words]Richard H. ShulmanApr 26, 2006 11:4144244
1Keep up the good work, Campus Watch! [135 words]concernedApr 25, 2006 07:0544091
Congrats [51 words]Bill HyltonApr 24, 2006 21:4844061
Restore, Not threaten [46 words]Darwin BarrettApr 23, 2006 21:0343946
An interesting word. [19 words]D WolfApr 20, 2006 02:1643633
1I love it [97 words]RogerApr 18, 2006 13:4843490
Totally agree with Roger [27 words]RMApr 23, 2006 10:1543490
1Let's look at high schools too [115 words]Arnie ServaisApr 18, 2006 10:4043473

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to 65 % against Bush and Campus Watch by Ynnatchkah

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

ADVERTISEMENTS

eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2019 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)