The San Francisco Hooligans
Reader comment on item: Extremists on Campus

Submitted by Yosie Lipschutz-Goldman (United States), Jul 2, 2002 at 19:26

I participated in the June 23 San Francico March Against Terror.

The pro-Israel anti-terror marchers were very well behaved and well mannered. Even the two "anti" groups - "Bay Area Women In Black" (a pacifist group) and the usual UC Berkeley "Jewish Voice Against The Occupation"-"JewishVoice for Peace" marchers were very well behaved and very civil.

But, there was this crowd (under a dozen) of so-called Palestinians. They were waving Palestinian flags, several of the males were wearing Yassir Arafat head gear, and two of the females were wearing Islamist rags (covered head to toe - one even had black gloves and dark sunglasses). The woman who was completely covered (gloves and shades) was a real piece of work - particularly verbal - "Hitler was right" "Jews are Nazis" etc. Also, her speech was unaccented.

One observation - the number of pro-Israel faculty persons was very high for the Bay Area. Realize - this was right after the French Hill homicide bombing. One of the faculty members told me that many Jewish faculty persons in the Bay Area have a special place in their hearts for French Hill - Mt. Scopus --- and regarded this particular attack as an attack on liberal American faculty members.

My reactions----

1. I cancelled my order for a 15 mpg SUV (I drive 50 miles a day on US 101) and ordered a hybrid ev. I don't want to pay for Wahabi madrassahs to train those individuals.

2. I have started a shareholders "Proposition" campaign against an airline that I own stock in. I am trying to get shareholder signaures to bring a "e American - Buy American" shareholders proposition to the next annual meeting. I do not want "my" airline to use French built Airbus Industries jets -- be American -- buy American made Boeing jets.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.