69 million page views

Daniel Pipes - as astute as ever

Reader comment on item: Middle East Debate: Should Washington Actively Promote an Israeli-Palestinian Peace Settlement?

Submitted by Lionel Gaffen (Israel), May 11, 2003 at 04:12

For the initial years after the Oslo Accords, I had hopes that the Palestinians would be able to go beyond their dream of destroying Israel- and that they would be willing to accept something that no other Arab state had ever offered them- a country of their own- on land that had already been given to the Jewish people ( the Sykes-Picot Treaty; I won't go into the historical discussion here, but it is a well known historical fact that the land we are discussing dividing was promised to the Jewish people in recent history, and not just ancient history).

I was wrong in believing that a terrorist like Arafat could ever be trusted to lead his people toward peace, and my country has suffered the consequences of believing in a failed leadership, and during the past 2 1/2 years, after Arafat declared a resumption of war against Israel, it has become obvious that diplomacy has failed ( Indyk's failed attempts, together with the entire Clinton administration, have only worsened the situation and prolonged the war ) and that Israel has had to, in effect, finally admit that we are at war with an enemy that seeks to eliminate us, and that we must act accordingly. In this case, it means vanquishing the enemy to the point where they no longer feel that it is in their interests to continue to wage war, and must look to peaceful means in order to further their interests. At that point, and only then, can diplomacy be effective in setting the parameters for both sides in a disengagement process. Daniel Pipes has been accurate in his analyses all along, while Indyk hasn't.
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (12) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
palestinian /israeli peace. [133 words]ToqueerOct 6, 2009 13:16162689
war [78 words]danielDec 8, 2005 06:5129638
Quantifying bias [333 words]Mladen AndrijasevicMay 17, 2003 11:209112
End Game Has Never Changed on Arab Side [309 words]Mike NMay 13, 2003 04:269021
Kudos on your comment and insight. Bravo [269 words]Wiseman DawoodyMay 13, 2003 00:459020
Something wrong with Indyk's soul [91 words]CaptainmikeMay 13, 2003 00:159018
Caution about Hebron Jews [189 words]Robert BreslauerMay 12, 2003 00:539008
deja-vu, all over again [229 words]John W. McGinleyMay 11, 2003 14:439001
The Middle East Debate [182 words]Arlinda DeAngelisMay 11, 2003 14:088999
Israel needs to get tough with them [97 words]David CottunMay 11, 2003 09:508997
Daniel Pipes - as astute as ever [279 words]Lionel GaffenMay 11, 2003 04:128995
Prediction Accuracy Hit Ratio [69 words]Mladen AndriasevicMay 11, 2003 03:448994

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)