69 million page views

Conclusions

Reader comment on item: West Africa - Europe's New Border
in response to reader comment: Differences between Europe and the USA

Submitted by Octavio Johanson (Italy), Mar 30, 2006 at 03:06

I hope this will be published for Sidda and Mark. It was interesting to find out about the Australian and American perspectives on illegal immigration and asylum.

Let me make some broad generalizations about the issue: in Europe, immigration = Islam; in the USA, immigration = Latin America; in Australia, immigration = Asia. Europe is unique. For example, the language-issue is not as relevant as in the USA. Aside from the French, who are very defensive about their own language, Europeans don't have a problem learning a second language. I speak 4 languages. And I have lived in different countries.

In Europe, the problem is that most immigrants are Muslims. That is what Euro-immigration is all about. There is a new Eurabia within Europe. In some parts of France, Belgium and Holland, you only see Islamic shops, Islamic bookshops, Islamic butchers.

Therefore, that is different from the Americans, who try to defend the use of English, and the Australians, who are surrounded by Asian nations. However, we all have something in common. For example, in all of these countries, politicians, bureaucrats, the most important newspapers, intellectuals, writers and powerful people in general, all support illegal immigration. It is powerful people who support open-borders vs common people who don't. The far-left is not alone in supporting this open-border policy.

The Financial Times is a pro free-market publication, and they support free-borders. But then, Le Monde is just the same. In 2001, the Australians rejected a boat of immigrants from the Middle East, and they were insulted by the international press. The powerful support illegal immigration and multi-culturalism. If you don't agree with them, they will use their power to humiliate you. That seems to be the same accross the West. The far-left, the big corporations, the press, politicians, law-enforcement officials and judges all support illegal immigration and multi-culturalism. Hard-working people try to rebel to this ideology, but they get humiliated and insulted by the powerful. If you don't agree with illegal immigration and multi-culturalism, then you are a "Nehanderthal racist", a monster and an ignorant person, as well as a failure and a loser. The fear of being labelled as a "racist", forces you to apply self-censorship. Dear Mark and Sidda, this is not about racial tolerance. It has never been. This is about power.
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (28) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
inaccuracies [170 words]la chica k trabaja con gentes sin papelesMay 29, 2010 17:16173511
I agree [68 words]S. AnguilarAug 5, 2006 23:3351759
Differences between Europe and the USA [96 words]Octavio JohansonMar 26, 2006 11:1241409
Octavio - that is changing [827 words]SiddaMar 28, 2006 18:3741409
Sidda: that's a no-win situation [221 words]Octavio JohansonMar 29, 2006 01:4341409
More feedback for Sidda [134 words]Octavio JohansonMar 29, 2006 10:0041409
to Octavio [575 words]SiddaMar 29, 2006 17:4141409
I am not a conservative either! [504 words]Octavio JohansonMar 30, 2006 01:2841409
Conclusions [384 words]Octavio JohansonMar 30, 2006 03:0641409
immigration [77 words]bob graysonApr 12, 2006 00:0741409
Re: immigration [69 words]Octavio JohansonApr 12, 2006 08:0241409
Bob Grayson [211 words]Octavio JohansonMay 26, 2006 19:2041409
The I-word [71 words]Octavio JohansonMar 25, 2006 18:2541367
This is madness! [74 words]Wayne WagnerMar 20, 2006 15:4840826
Your readers and me [99 words]Octavio JohansonMar 20, 2006 01:5540757
I live in Spain [75 words]Octavio JohansonMar 20, 2006 05:3140757
Brother Octavio , Its hard to follow the rules sometimes !! [170 words]SinghDec 6, 2006 13:3240757
how to solve the Canary Island problem [278 words]MarkMar 20, 2006 00:3540755
Oh, Australia! [223 words]Octavio JohansonMar 20, 2006 04:4440755
I also live in Spain, further more I'm Spanish [98 words]Gonzalo MayordomoMar 26, 2006 11:3540755
Gonzalo [17 words]Octavio JohansonMar 27, 2006 03:5040755
Point 3 is no solution [231 words]Farid H.Apr 6, 2006 14:0940755
EU-camps not possible [85 words]MikeApr 28, 2006 06:5340755
Sorting the canary island problem [98 words]rienMay 13, 2006 09:0740755
Immigration is necessary for development but Muslim Immigrants are Threat to Europe [61 words]BillooDec 6, 2006 13:1040755
South Africa has the same problem [218 words]Josh SmithApr 13, 2007 23:2040755
1The problem of illegal migration [323 words]Mary ConnorDec 3, 2007 22:0940755
right [8 words]Einsten SpearsJan 11, 2009 22:5840755

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Conclusions by Octavio Johanson

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)