Understanding the Nuclear Dilemma From a Differing Perspective - Humanity May Not Survive a Peace It Cannot Enforce

Submitted by M Tovey (United States), Oct 31, 2022 at 18:35

Being a baby boomer having lived most of the American type of lifestyle for nearly the entirety of the nuclear umbrella of threat of global dominace, one aspect that could hardly be anticipated was after the American use of atomic devastation in order to shorten further hostilties and lessen the cost in more casualties trying to bring about the end to a war that really made no real sense to rational thinking, all that American act on behalf of stopping the last war did was fill the minds of similar irrational elitists with possibilites of how to start the next 'incident' and bring the world to nuclear disaster with catastrophic endings caused by suicidal megalomanaical aspirations of unrestrained evil. There are mutiple contenders in the winds for that very act.
Who that might be is yet undetermined; actually, it may be a baby boomer.
Which brings the conversation to who is prepared if humanity does not find the chord of harmony by which the desires of peace may be stuck and mankind finds its way from under that umbrella and into the light of ratiionality that supercedes human thinking and finds that rushing to self destruction requires thinking that supercedes human thinking.
Unfortunately, humanity has historically broken that mold and only in the writings of the Children of Abraham is the answer to the nuclear question found. Humanity will eventually find out that does not end well.
Abraham finds that faith in the God that preserves Israel is the key to life. Failing that becomes the cautionary tale for whose who follow the rebellion to its inevitable conclusion: salvation in Abraham's descendent, the Holy One of Israel, becomes the only escape, including the nclear option.
It is wriiten, in Him all things consist: where does anyone think the basis for nuclear power come from?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".