69 million page views

Ideology versus Religion - Incompatibility Leading to Rejection in No Uncertain Terms

Reader comment on item: A Century of the Muslim Brotherhood
in response to reader comment: IDEOLOGY - word coined by Antoine Louis Claude Destutt, comte de Tracy

Submitted by M Tovey (United States), Sep 23, 2022 at 11:38

An intriguing insight; yet first, a nod of gratitude to Reader Robert, for the look back to the era in which freedom in America was instrumentally enacted under the auspices of law and order under Divine principles (the Constitution), but of which ideological determinations towards minimizing religious influences were made.
In many respects, ideological intersections of humanity's expansion into the Gospel age were already noticed in the letters that the Apostles Paul and Peter, noting the Gnostic intrusions by which questions of supernatural influences were introduced in order to allow a greater freedom of choice: to believe or not to believe.
Comte de Tracy's contribution to the philosophical changes occurring during these times most specifically had their influences when seen as contemporary with Locke et al; even to the extent of influencing the greatest influencer of the modern age, Marx. Religion was seen as the greater evil to be shunned when looking at how to govern after the empires were defeated. The differences were that ideology replaces religion since the reasoning of man was to replace the reasoning of deity.
It has been demonstrated that the philosophical underpinnings of this observer is as a believing disciple of the Messiah, Yeshua; in following by faith, not religion. A protestant Episcopalian background, barely touched by an extremely limited adventure into academia eventually led to an encounter by which the reasoning of human intellectualism failed to alter a truth: that a frail mankind could not determine the end of mortality outside of the Holy Writ and only belief in the indicated Deity was proven beyond any doubt that life was under His control.
Marx rejected that; yet that cannot be obtained in ideological terms, even as one might try to understand from comte de Tracy.
Again, thanks to Reader Robert.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)