69 million page views

Distinction of Muslim Brotherhood - Which Version was Supported by the 44th American Administration with In-House Membership?

Reader comment on item: A Century of the Muslim Brotherhood
in response to reader comment: el-Ikhwan el-Muslimeen or is it al-Ikhwan al-Muslimuun?

Submitted by M Tovey (United States), Sep 4, 2022 at 22:09

Once again, this observer extends an appreciation to DNM and to Dr Pipes for providing certain perceptions and studied observances in how one of the more troubling aspects of how a world searching desperately for peace is frustrated time and again with attitudes of indecent animosities towards those who seek peace but are targeted by expressions of ancient hatreds by actors who cannot see past their darkened expressions to realize they are targeting themselves for extinction as well.
What's in a name? In Arabic, whether classical or Egyptian (which is the clearer expression of the Aramaic local languages in the Levant versus the much older Egyptian expressions coming from the Land of the Pharaohs?); the MB appears to be having an identity crisis; which linguistic practice of Islam are they really following: al-Tabari or al-Qurtubi? DNM, anyone?

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Distinction of Muslim Brotherhood - Which Version was Supported by the 44th American Administration with In-House Membership? by M Tovey

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2022 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)