69 million page views

Constant Threats Call for Constant Vigilence - Israel's Stance Among Friends or Foes

Reader comment on item: Backhanded Endorsements of Campus Watch

Submitted by M Tovey (United States), Aug 27, 2022 at 19:18

One of the more observable tendencies of those that practice anti-Semitism is that they remain observably ignorant of why their enmity towards Israel and the Jewish Diaspora distresses them to no redeeming end of their frustrations. Thus, such as the case (one citation of so many) found in the tome " Overcoming Zionism," in which one ls led to presume that defeating Israel becomes the ultimate endeavor that after centuries, even millennia, proves fruitless since apparently, the original lie of why so many hate the Jewish nation cannot be eliminated from the perennial and overt obsession that humanity cannot conquer.
Further to the perception that such an attitude of endemic hatred towards a particular demographic of ancient origins is still one that escapes any rational analytical determination that pursuing such a course is self-defeating, if any with an understanding of human destiny were to examine the records of the ancients and realize the pronouncement of condemnation on those who have tried, and failed disastrously; and their future matches those who continue to try are equally tried and found wanting.
In the contention that Campus Watch cannot be trusted to analyze critiques of Israel, they are not alone; and the destiny of the Zionist future of that nation continues to send frustrations of futilities for any who hold any antagonism towards the Jewish heirs of Abraham's promise. It is not going to get any better.
To the contrary, if one reviews the varying contentions of whether there is any reprieve from, say, the Islamic sector that Dr. Pipes studies and hypothecates on a moderation of Islamic intentions (the Abrahamic Accords - Muslim participation by the minor Arabic contenders - in the modern context and its opposition by the Iranian Islamic Regime's ambition) by which there might be a chance to bring cessation of hostilities as promulgated by the 'Palestinian' proxies, how does that fare in the Islamic communities that would rather contemplate self-imposed desires of still wanting to see Israel eliminated essentially to satisfy self-imposed self-destructive thoughts and attitudes of hatred that can be assessed by observers like Campus Watch and like institutions which see the futility of the threats to peaceful societies like Israel.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Constant Threats Call for Constant Vigilence - Israel's Stance Among Friends or Foes by M Tovey

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2023 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)