69 million page views

Why the appeal???

Reader comment on item: [Bureaucratic Leftism and] Globalthink's Perils

Submitted by Howard Veit (United States), Sep 25, 2002 at 18:13

1. Victimization is popular. Every loser can blame somebody else, usually those horrid heterosexual white males. This bureaucratic left "movement" has emotional appeal to a majority of people who'd prefer to succeed by pulling those above them down to their level. It beats working their tails off.

2. The idea, perpetrated by the Left since God left Chicago, states: "the majority is always wrong". Meaning that the enlightened Left is always right, elections are either rigged or stolen, people are too stupid to understand the Left. This empowers them to act regardless of votes and attracts losers.

3. Protection: people want to be taken care of, loved, petted. Anyone who promises that is good.
A. Women have the billion year old biological urge to protect the child they carry in their wombs. As a group, not as individuals, they want to be protected against the harsh world, first and foremost. They tend to regard their jobs as family, their investments as children, and their homes as hiding places. This urge to be protected translates into their social interaction, political activity, and career choices (tenure, civil service, large corporate welfare states). Women are comfortable being victims. They lean to this leftist bureaucracy . Any idea that tells them the world in which they live is threatening and the new world will not be threatening will appeal to them. And yes I know about Ann Coulter, Barbara Olsen, Ayn Rand, Hannah Arendt etc., etc., I'm talking about groups.

4. Fontes' article points to the linkage between 1920's communism and this movement now. It is almost identical except that workers don't count at all because they are too stupid to do anything but follow the smart leaders. Dictatorship of the proletariat is being replaced by dictatorship of elites. A return to the Europe of pre-World War I. For a terrific article about this go to: http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/001/659rpqyj.asp?ZoomFont=YES. A really thought provoking piece.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Why the appeal??? by Howard Veit

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2022 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)