69 million page views

Add Judicial Overreach to the Perils of Bureaucratic Leftism

Reader comment on item: [Bureaucratic Leftism and] Globalthink's Perils

Submitted by Andy Steinfeld (United States), Sep 24, 2002 at 15:14

Using judges to end-run elected officials is increasingly a preferred method of the left. It elevates political issues to the status of legal questions, and can result in a court doing the bidding of a political movement. This tactic is used both internationally and domestically. Consider the following:

Henry Kissinger, in his recent book, "Does America Need A Foreign Policy?," notes the trend toward elevating judges above elected officials in matters of international relations. The attempted extradition of former Chilean President Augusto Pinochet from Britain to Spain to stand trial for human rights abuses against Spanish citizens, while ultimately unsuccessful, saw a judge in Spain get a former leader of a second country imprisoned in a third country pending review of his request. Dr. Kissinger concedes the legitimacy of tribunals convened ad hoc to investigate specific wrongs, such as the trial of Slobadan Milosevic currently ongoing in the Hague. But he warns of the implications of allowing judges to indict the leaders of other countries ad hominem to further their own political agendas, agendas which in most cases are not subject to review by the electorate.

Closer to home, Californians voted several years ago to scrap affirmative action. The results of this popular referendum were challenged in federal district court. The district court threw out the vote, but was subsequently overruled by the appeals court, which reinstated the results of the referendum. Nonetheless, the rear-guard action got off to a strong start. In the years since, the University of California has repeatedly publicized its implementation of new policies designed to encourage increased racial diversity among its students. These policies violate the spirit, if not the letter, of the referendum passed by the people of California. The man behind the first referendum, University of California Regent Ward Connerly, is now spearheading a second anti-affirmative-action referendum, because the first, though victorious at the polls, has been largely ignored in practice.

The point is not whether Augusto Pinochet should be tried for human rights abuses or whether the University of California would benefit from increased racial diversity among its student body. The point is that democracies exist to allow all parties the opportunity to present their points of view, and to allow the people to choose among them subject to constitutional constraints. When one side of the debate refuses to recognize that the other side won, it weakens the system for all.

This campaign of "politics by other means" weakens the system by distorting the clarity which open elections in the first instance, and the public actions of elected officials in the second instance, provide to the political process. Even where the left's final objective of a court-ordered result is not obtained, judicial intervention in the political process cloaks the left's anti-democratic bias in a veil of legitimacy, and muddies the political waters to such an extent that well-regarded institutions such as the University of California are proud to publicize their efforts to subvert the popular will. Opponents of bureaucratic leftism might do well to take a closer look at the left's improper use of the judiciary to further its political agenda.
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (44) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Great Article [101 words]Johnny CarpatiNov 14, 2005 20:3028382
Transnational Progressivism Has Infiltrated the GOP and Free Republic [192 words]Steve SadlovJan 5, 2005 13:2119435
Global economy is like swiss cheese with more holes than cheese [242 words]Tapart Real NewsOct 20, 2003 00:0011846
Don't forget fanatical secularism [323 words]ChanaMar 13, 2003 20:547224
Why should the world bow to the US' policies? [133 words]Hugh BarrOct 1, 2002 07:472770
No ones asking anyone to "bow" to the US [147 words]BillBixbySep 7, 2009 08:102770
Two points [137 words]Andrea BayneSep 28, 2002 12:162685
Only for us [80 words]Marcus WhiteSep 27, 2002 16:472671
President Bush made his point very clearly [32 words]Greg OfieshSep 27, 2002 14:232669
U.N.: a nice idea but... [36 words]Andrew SummeySep 27, 2002 13:252665
EQUALITY - discontent in disguise. [135 words]A Canadian named LennSep 27, 2002 00:332660
The views of Dr. Pipes are not welcome in left wing Canada [203 words]Jeff BercovitchSep 26, 2002 09:412655
Curious premises [424 words]Mark BaberSep 26, 2002 07:062653
Let Europe Fight its Own Battes [94 words]Eugene A. GenoveseSep 26, 2002 01:222650
Schism of UN into Oceana and Eastasia... [241 words]Steven KlonSep 26, 2002 00:112647
Liberal - Modern or Classical? [238 words]Mark W. GlennSep 25, 2002 18:222644
Why the appeal??? [315 words]Howard VeitSep 25, 2002 18:132643
Communist Goals in 1963 Congressional Record [43 words]C.G. DavisSep 25, 2002 16:432642
Homosexuals will be persecuted, too [127 words]Steven Malcolm AndersonSep 25, 2002 14:142639
"Transnational Progressivism" or Globalization? [275 words]Leon HadarSep 25, 2002 13:502638
Bureaucracy as mass movement [352 words]John J. OlsonSep 25, 2002 10:452634
Next war - against lethargic monstrous bureaucracies. [97 words]John B. JaymesSep 25, 2002 10:322633
Free Association [419 words]Jean L. Martin (M.A., M.S.S.W.)Sep 25, 2002 09:582632
World Tyranny [136 words]Tom HalleySep 25, 2002 09:372631
Taxation Without Representation [202 words]Dave MarciniakSep 25, 2002 08:352629
A friendly criticism [129 words]Joe WillinghamSep 24, 2002 23:282624
Globalitarianism [218 words]C.G. DavisSep 24, 2002 22:272622
It might be worse now~ [199 words]Lawrence RicciSep 24, 2002 22:022621
So what is the surprise? [182 words]Robert FusfeldSep 24, 2002 21:432620
Welcome To Canada [313 words]Stephen BlogginsSep 24, 2002 20:252619
Very Perceptive! [61 words]Paul TardifSep 24, 2002 18:582618
The Dream Palace of the Liberals [325 words]Ben ShniperSep 24, 2002 17:052615
And one more thing... [18 words]Howard GoldSep 24, 2002 16:122613
Add Judicial Overreach to the Perils of Bureaucratic Leftism [516 words]Andy SteinfeldSep 24, 2002 15:142612
Not just Leftist [263 words]Glenn KlotzSep 24, 2002 15:042610
Nothing new under the sun. [375 words]SheerahkahnSep 24, 2002 14:262609
American ingenuity or Imperial iniative? [129 words]Mark FeldsteinSep 24, 2002 14:252608
"Bureaucratic Leftism" [15 words]Mordecai J. GoldSep 24, 2002 14:252607
You must be kidding! [114 words]C Murray AdamsSep 24, 2002 14:152606
Bureaucratization of Decision Making [74 words]Alan PerlmutterSep 24, 2002 14:062605
New World Order [298 words]Terrall PutnamSep 24, 2002 14:042604
The New World Order [266 words]Ken BesigSep 24, 2002 13:192602
The Nanny State [102 words]Dan SchwartzSep 24, 2002 13:012601
Recent NY Post article [21 words]norman rushSep 24, 2002 10:322599

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)