69 million page views

Not now? Here's why we sat NOW!

Reader comment on item: Pollard Pardon? Not Now

Submitted by Paul la Demain (United States), Feb 24, 2014 at 15:31

Might the point you raised in this article also speak to the spinelessness of Israel's PM and his elderly, loquacious "president"? That each of the foregoing has a long record of engaging in abject conciliations that would embarrass the leaders of other nations had the latter engaged in the same sort of national debasement? Or are you saying that the Jews of Israel are as twisted as the lobby known as the "J Street" Jews; Jews who defame the nation of Israel and lobby for the destruction of the nation of Israel by arab forces? In short, why do these Jews talk big and brag about their "wonderfulness" and then behave as if they think they are inferior to, let's say, Catholics? The Vatican has countenanced horrors and yet you will not see Catholics lobbying Washington to destroy the Vatican. To the contrary, the Reagan administration established diplomatic relations with the Vatican as if it were a state (an act that in many minds skirts the standards and values laid out in the US constitution.) Indeed, there is no Catholic counterpart to the "J Street" Jews.

Are you not intimating that Israeli officials really are afraid to rebuff extortion and reject bullying? That their fear is not a charade engaged in to tamp down the anxieties of Sunnis and Shiites while providing cover for US interests in the middle east? And are you intimating that the US State Dept. is well aware of their spinelessness and will, as in the past, poke and abuse Israeli government officials as if they were marshmallows? Or are you saying that the people of Israel are less interested in an honest democracy than the people in the streets in the Ukraine? Or are you saying that Jews in the US are afraid of criticism and nastiness and that the Jews of Israel are more interested in individual self-reward than fealty to their nation---much in the same manner as the unstatesmanlike misconduct of corporate purchasers of US politicians and the self-indulgent politicians willing to be bought?

We believe Pollard should be released in the name of justice in order to prove that justice remains a principal of the US judicial and political system and that bargaining for his release, should this become a factor for his release, would shame both sides, more so the US.

If what we read about Caspar Weinberger (not a Jew, by the way) is true, then this man's adherence to British interests---especially with respect to taking sides with the UK in the matter of the Falkland Islands, his rejection of this paternal grandparent's transient Jewish faith---all of this should be brought into light because it speaks to the man's character and obsessions. From the distance imparted by the passage of time, it appears that Weinberger was driven to express his antipathy toward the Jewish faith by singling out Pollard for excessive punishment; punishment that Weinberger did not support for the members of the John Walker spy ring that actually harmed US national security. Pollard merely spied for a US ally, his spying did not harm US interests, and perhaps he spied for Israel because the US had double-crossed Israel. Some day the whole truth will emerge. As we all know now, the US spies on everyone, apparently sniffing for political antagonists as well as the real dangers posed by al Q.

--- SC4Z [Secular Christians for Zion]

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Daniel Pipes replies:

My criticism of the Israeli leadership concerns not its spinelessness but its lack of strategic thinking.

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (38) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
SHARON SCARANGE [31 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Ameer Labeeb HassanMay 18, 2014 22:11214886
RONALD WILLIAM PELTON [121 words]Ameer Labeeb HassanMay 20, 2014 21:24214886
A non-Jewish approach [192 words]Efim MAIDANIKMay 11, 2014 17:35214792
Israel will release terrorists anyway [43 words]MotkeMar 26, 2014 19:42214032
Pollard And America [309 words]Mark DMar 23, 2014 17:34213945
Pollard Should Be Freed [24 words]Lujack SkylarkMar 15, 2014 14:24213803
Ukraine Live Stream [21 words]SteveMar 1, 2014 08:50213507
Head of the Ukraine Presidential Administration praises Israel [282 words]Andrei GMar 14, 2022 06:27213507
Hillary And Democrats [26 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Mark DMar 1, 2014 00:21213498
1Pollard Pardon? Not Now. [156 words]JudithFeb 28, 2014 16:21213486
2Jonathan Pollard will probably die in prison [301 words]Michael S.Mar 12, 2014 15:45213486
JONATHAN JAY POLLARD [306 words]Ameer Labeeb HassanMay 18, 2014 22:07213486
Pollard Pardon? Not Now [47 words]JudithMay 20, 2014 21:44213486
TO JUDITH [187 words]Ameer Labeeb HassanMay 23, 2014 05:09213486
Agree & Disagree [157 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Dean M.Feb 25, 2014 11:02213425
Precisely my point [154 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Dean M.Mar 4, 2014 11:19213425
Terms of the Deal [44 words]Dean MMar 6, 2014 20:50213425
Are you sure? [273 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
MaccabeeFeb 25, 2014 00:06213421
US VS Pollard and Zionists [51 words]steven LFeb 24, 2014 18:43213416
Khodorkovsky's comparison [37 words]PermReaderFeb 28, 2014 12:08213416
Not now? Here's why we sat NOW! [567 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Paul la DemainFeb 24, 2014 15:31213414
With equally heavy heart... [70 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Barry GoldbergFeb 24, 2014 13:59213410
But what of his health status? [49 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Sarah R.Feb 24, 2014 13:38213409
Pollards's release [13 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
GladysFeb 24, 2014 11:55213406
Pollard [67 words]PermReaderMar 1, 2014 14:09213406
1Free Pollard [46 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
wpapkeFeb 24, 2014 11:36213405
1Pollard could be released in 2015 on parole without Israel making concessions [23 words]Joel SteinkeFeb 24, 2014 10:17213404
The Rosenbergs - Pollard - Madoff [144 words]Jesse TaubFeb 24, 2014 10:02213403
1Dr. Pipes, I don't think you want to wait until Jonathan Pollard is dead. [34 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
CDG, YerushalayimFeb 24, 2014 09:42213402
You too? [26 words]Hazel WhiteFeb 24, 2014 08:41213399
What this really means [33 words]Brad BrzezinskiFeb 24, 2014 08:17213397
not to mention malley [13 words]MarkFeb 24, 2014 07:49213396
I beg to differ [69 words]Yehuda ZFeb 24, 2014 05:16213395
Pollard release [142 words]StephenFeb 24, 2014 04:57213394
Pollard as hostage [53 words]NevilleFeb 24, 2014 02:55213390
Flawed Argument [130 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Gamaliel IsaacFeb 24, 2014 01:09213389
American interests [44 words]Bill PikeFeb 24, 2014 00:38213387
Pllard mean [44 words]Steel Pipes In IndiaMar 21, 2014 06:32213387

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Not now? Here's why we sat NOW! by Paul la Demain

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)