69 million page views

appeasement and censorship in Europe

Reader comment on item: The End of American Jewry's Golden Era

Submitted by marc joris (Belgium), Apr 27, 2004 at 09:37

One of the main obstacles in confronting militant Islam in many European countries is their dysfunctional legislation against "racism". Even factual criticism towards Islamic misbehavior – female circumcision for example- can be considered as a criminal act. Daniel Pipes' negative experiences at American universities are dwarfed by the legal trouble he would run into if he had to write and publish in a European country. All European nations have legislation protecting freedom of speech, but unlike the First Amendment in the US, this laws are empty shells. Many governments try to appease Islam by using outright censorship against politicians and journalists who share Daniel Pipes' views. A recent example can be found in Belgium. The Times wrote an alarming article about it. … But no one seems to listen.

As the article is only accessible for registrated readers, I have added it in this e-mail.

Opinion, april 24, 2004, The Times

I've seen the future: it's scary and Belgian

by STEPHEN POLLARD

THE PRIME MINISTER makes much of the "scare stories" and "myths" which opponents of further deepening of the EU supposedly propagate. They are based, apparently, on paranoia, and are products of not-so-latent xenophobia.

Well here's a very scary story which is not speculation but fact. This week democracy - the right to vote for the party you wish to support - ended inside one EU member state.

On Wednesday, the Belgian judiciary banned a political party from operating in Belgium. The reason? The country's political establishment dislikes its views. The party it banned is not some obscure fringe organisation but one which has 18 MPs in the 150-seat Belgian parliament, many local councillors and two MEPs. The opinion polls were predicting that it could win the most Belgian votes at the European and local elections in June.

The banned party is Vlaams Blok (VB). The Court of Appeal in Ghent - notorious for its left-liberal bias - deemed it to be an "undemocratic and racist" organisation because of its policy that immigrants should be given only two choices: "to assimilate or to return home".

Maybe such a policy is indeed racist; maybe it isn't. The VB itself, which has much in common with the Fortuyn List in the Netherlands, has been accused of this. But in a democracy, surely, that is a decision which voters should make, not judges. But the VB's racism was merely an excuse. The real reason why the Belgian authorities have been bent on banning the VB for years has nothing to do with racism and the rights of immigrants. It is that the party advocates secession from Belgium and the establishment of a Republic of Flanders. Worse still, as Belgium's only conservative party it upsets the country's cosy political applecart. The Belgian Establishment has responded not by defeating it in argument but by banning it.

After Wednesday's ruling, it is now illegal to distribute VB publications and its politicians are barred from state radio and television. The party is appealing against the ruling, but the Belgian judiciary's predisposition to do the bidding of the political class means that the appeal has almost no chance of succeeding. When the ban is confirmed, the VB will be proclaimed a criminal organisation and disbanded, unable to exist, let alone to field candidates and argue its case.

I hold no brief for the VB; and were I to have a vote in Flanders, I would not vote for it. But that is not the point. What happened in Ghent on Wednesday is a frightening, but classic demonstration of the political mindset which lies behind the EU's "ever-closer union": if you do not sign up to certain beliefs then your politics are, by definition, beyond the pale and thus illegitimate.

The ruling was merely the latest in a series of attempts to destroy the VB because of the threat it posed to the Belgian status quo. In 1999, "undemocratic and racist" parties were banned from receiving state funding (private donations of more than 125 euros are illegal in Belgium). This decision was immediately followed by an action against the VB on those grounds. When a Flemish judge refused to issue a judgment, arguing that these were matters for the electorate rather than the courts, the head of the Centre for Equal Opportunities, the quango which had brought the case said that he would continue appealing until he had found a judge who would find against the VB. This week one emerged: Alain Smetrijns, who happens also to be the chairman of the Lions Club in Ghent, a francophone pro-Belgian unity group.

Belgium is in many ways a mini-EU: an artificial state created (much like Europe's three former such states, the Soviet Union, Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia) as a result of political ideology rather than any sense of national unity, and held together by a political class which is prepared to subvert democracy to achieve its ends. Add to that a judiciary which, far from being independent of the political establishment, is an important part of the problem - and you have a recipe for what took place in Ghent this week: democracy, Belgian-style, in which you may vote only for a party whose views are approved by the elites. The actions may be specific to Belgium, but the lesson is of wider import. The EU is in the process of becoming just such an artificial state. The fate of the Vlaams Blok shows that worries about the future of democracy are not scare stories. They are real dangers and they are with us today.

The author is a senior Fellow at the Centre for the New Europe, a Brussels-based think tank.


Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (52) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Jews in Denial of the Dark Days coming: Attracted to two scoundrels: 1) Obama & 2) Madoff [66 words]james burkeMay 26, 2009 08:24156167
Listen to those who have gone before us... [370 words]Veronique CarewFeb 18, 2008 01:54120435
Jew v. Jew [282 words]Jeff BurkeFeb 1, 2007 09:1075391
America HAS to be the World's Policeman [523 words]Dr RJPJul 1, 2006 12:4648665
america doesnt HAVE to be the worlds policeman [140 words]r.o.Apr 16, 2009 18:3948665
Militant religions [79 words]Gary NewmanSep 18, 2005 09:1925997
"Politically Correct" American fools..... [205 words]Vicki MorganSep 7, 2005 10:4225556
"Politically Correct" American fools [148 words]OlieJan 25, 2007 16:4425556
A Rebuttal [380 words]A ThinkerJan 7, 2011 16:0525556
The existence of "moderate" Muslims [75 words]Avigdor Ben-DovSep 7, 2005 02:0325544
response to Avi the Zionist [66 words]Abdulfattah BudayrNov 22, 2009 09:5525544
Reader's Observation [94 words]MordechaiAug 12, 2005 13:3524601
Defend It or lose it-Your heritage [89 words]SanmiFeb 16, 2005 15:1220399
Wake up America...When? [148 words]Chris ShivnerFeb 15, 2005 23:1920374
Americans won't allow an Islamic State in US [75 words]Kevin LoudonFeb 15, 2005 22:2520373
Islam [5 words]DadJul 20, 2006 14:1420373
Americans and the world converting to Islam. [118 words]LulwaNov 25, 2009 05:1320373
Good Article [14 words]StaceyFeb 15, 2005 14:2920364
My concerns are confirmed [186 words]Anne LeonardiMay 15, 2004 22:2915236
agree with you [89 words]Helen GordonMay 15, 2004 12:2815229
Face the truth - not the teachings.. [101 words]Anatoly GoldbergMay 10, 2004 15:2915105
Face the truth - not the teachings.. [98 words]Anatoly GoldbergMay 10, 2004 15:2715104
The end of American Jewry? [90 words]Elaine NugentMay 10, 2004 11:3615102
Excellent [87 words]SPMay 7, 2004 03:5015075
Militant Islam and jehadis+ [59 words]S.C.PandaMay 5, 2004 06:0715056
scary but true [84 words]yuval BrandstetterMay 4, 2004 13:0615033
detail mistake [13 words]ron thompsonMay 3, 2004 17:4915024
The End of American Jewry's Golden Era-Daniel Pipes Comments [82 words]NormanMay 3, 2004 15:0015023
The Koran vs The Bible [24 words]Alan TrombettaMay 3, 2004 11:3315021
notrelated to this article [1615 words]bob buckMay 3, 2004 09:3315018
Homegrown terrorism in the US will become reality unless .... [126 words]C FreedMay 3, 2004 00:4215015
Religion vs Religion or Religion vs Secularity? [531 words]A.Hamilton MencherMay 2, 2004 22:0515013
curious [117 words]AlinaJan 10, 2011 08:4515013
makes one think [169 words]yvette martinMay 2, 2004 16:5015011
Excellent!! [100 words]Darwin BarrettMay 2, 2004 16:3515009
Thailand: Killing other people is God's will in Islamic religion? [227 words]PraornMay 2, 2004 08:3215005
How can I help?? [148 words]cindy connerMay 2, 2004 08:2515004
As The Islamist Trogan Horse Grows [87 words]Major Peter St, Jean USAF retMay 2, 2004 07:1315002
Winston Churchill and the Fall of France [302 words]Uzi Amit-KohnMay 2, 2004 06:5215001
3"We await the verdict of honest men " [3623 words]Daniel WyboApr 2, 2006 11:2715001
Can we take off the Union Jacked glasses for a minute... [843 words]ArmyDickedNov 25, 2012 03:5915001
Michael C. Goncalves [394 words]ArmyDickedJan 30, 2013 05:5515001
Finally someone has assimilated Pipes concepts [79 words]Shimon PerlmutterMay 2, 2004 06:5015000
Food for Thought [454 words]Peter J. HerzMay 2, 2004 05:2914999
It is painfull to face reality. [66 words]Esther ElbazMay 1, 2004 21:3814995
The same in Europe [76 words]annemarie cherletApr 30, 2004 04:1614955
Islamist vs. Jew [91 words]Timothy B. RobertsApr 29, 2004 00:1114941
Islamic Canada [18 words]L. McClainApr 28, 2004 16:2314927
will pass this on - but the date? [35 words]roshApr 27, 2004 14:5214893
appeasement and censorship in Europe [940 words]marc jorisApr 27, 2004 09:3714880
ANOTHER wake up call [38 words]RichierichApr 27, 2004 09:0114879
It could be worse [338 words]Kenneth BesigApr 27, 2004 06:4614878

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)