28 readers online now

103,471 comments by 27,323 readers

Go to Mobile Site

Peter Arnett's Freedom of Speech
Reader comment on item: Iraq: What's Next?

Submitted by William Lucas Jones (United States), Mar 31, 2003 at 19:56

BAGHDAD, Iraq (CNN) -- NBC announced Monday that both NBC and National Geographic severed their relationships with veteran war correspondent Peter Arnett.
On Sunday, NBC News had issued a statement supporting Arnett, saying that Arnett gave the interview to Iraqi TV as a "professional courtesy" and that his remarks "were analytical in nature and were not intended to be anything more."
But a day later, NBC issued a different statement. "It was wrong for him to grant an interview to state-run Iraqi TV, especially in a time of war."
National Geographic issued a statement that read:
"The Society did not authorize or have any prior knowledge of Arnett's television interview with Iraqi television, and had we been consulted, would not have allowed it."

All of this is very distressing to me. As a result of NBC/Nat’l Geographic’s actions curtailing freedom of speech and freedom of the press, I will now sever all relationships I have had, with them, now and in the future. I will encourage all of my friends and family to do so also.

If I were a practicing "Journalist", I would go on strike until this very fine reporter was restored and those responsible for terminating him, were theirselves, terminated. I sincerely doubt this will happen since there are few real journalists left.

Sincerely,

William Lucas Jones


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (34) on this item

Title By Date
treason? [185 words]ken yetzerApr 3, 2003 03:03
Iraqi Peter [64 words]Love My SoldiersApr 2, 2003 06:03
Professional issue, not a political one [79 words]Molly A. Badgett, APRApr 1, 2003 22:26
Against war [29 words]Mohammad Ali KhalidApr 1, 2003 21:44
Too Many Are Missing the Point [127 words]Jason McMahonApr 1, 2003 21:28
Arnett [25 words]Edgardo GascaApr 1, 2003 21:11
Arnett should seek another country [43 words]AnnetteApr 1, 2003 18:04
Bravo arnet..la libertad de expresion no debe morir [60 words]dessin georgesApr 1, 2003 15:44
Peter Arnett's freedom to speak [48 words]lucy koteenApr 1, 2003 09:39
Pulitzer Prize for Deception [33 words]NickApr 1, 2003 09:23
The Truth? [826 words]David UmbargerApr 1, 2003 01:48
Arnett is entitled to his opinion but... [46 words]Sgt. William R. SayersMar 31, 2003 21:30
Disgusted with Arnett [81 words]Dr. Larry LippincottMar 31, 2003 21:27
⇒ Peter Arnett's Freedom of Speech [217 words]William Lucas JonesMar 31, 2003 19:56
May he rot [106 words]DeeDee MoxieMar 31, 2003 18:57
Arnett's firing is absurd [133 words]wpcMar 31, 2003 18:05
Arnett the Traitor [13 words]John DanielsMar 31, 2003 17:29
Peter Arnett [10 words]Rose Marie GruttadauriaMar 31, 2003 17:09
Pulitzer Prize Winner - Mr. Arnett [66 words]Robert W. WylieMar 31, 2003 12:50
Bravo Peter Arnett, bravo! [50 words]Laurie ManisMar 31, 2003 12:07
Another Jane Fonda wannabe [154 words]Robert HuffordMar 31, 2003 10:39
Peter Arnett fired [35 words]susana bonilla matthewsMar 31, 2003 09:34
Re: Peter Arnett [199 words]Barbara MireauMar 31, 2003 07:37
Peter Arnett [89 words]HowieMar 31, 2003 01:52
Slimy Arnett [49 words]MYWhiteMar 31, 2003 00:09
Peter Arnett [31 words]Les StierwaltMar 30, 2003 20:28
Peter Arnett has hurt the war [34 words]John SchlagMar 30, 2003 19:23
Arnett has gone too far" [100 words]Geraldine M SepulvedaMar 30, 2003 18:48
another jane fonda [39 words]chester bartkoMar 30, 2003 18:17
Heck, no he hasn't mellowed! [16 words]M. McAlexanderMar 30, 2003 18:11
Drain the Swamp [109 words]Glenn KlotzAug 19, 2002 06:43
Pearls Before Swine [181 words]D.R.Aug 17, 2002 00:53
Has Peter Arnett mellowed? [35 words]Paul M. NevilleAug 16, 2002 17:34
Matthews was unfair to Pipes and Hackworth [56 words]Alan MencheerAug 16, 2002 07:50

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

ADVERTISEMENTS

eXTReMe Tracker

All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © 1968-2010 Daniel Pipes. Email: MeqMef@aol.com

You can help support Daniel Pipes' work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.