| Daniel Pipes Mobile Edition Regular Site |
|
| Home | Articles | Blog | Reviews | Search | |
Submitted by DeadMessenger (United States), Dec 17, 2006 at 14:22
I learned that Tasha Douglas, represented by the ACLU, had succeeded in getting the Grand Rapids, Michigan Rapid transit service adminstration to recind its own rule against people attempting to ride in veiled clothing. I'll let the letter speak for itself, but I urge anyone interested in preserving our collective security to write or call the transit authorities and inform them of your concern.
http://deadmessenger.wordpress.com/2006/12/17/msg-december-17-2006-shes-got-a-ticket-to-ride/
To:
The Rapid, Administrative Headquarters
Attn: Peter Varga, Executive Director
300 Ellsworth SW
Grand Rapids, MI 49503-4005
Phone: (616) 456-7514
Office Hours: Monday - Friday 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
info@ridetherapid.org
Greetings Mr. Peter Varga,
I recently learned that administrators of The Rapid have rescinded their rule against riders covering their face with headress and veils. I can't tell you how disappointed I am. Being a native US citizen I have to say this is inconsistent with our customs and governance as an open society. That rider's custom and insistence on wearing such a headress on The Rapid is a seciurty threat. In addition, it is a symbol, travesty, and insult to women's rights around the world. It is not a matter of racisim or denial of religous rights. I think your employee's got it dead right, last July, when they denied Tasha Douglas the right to wear it while she was riding the train.
In western european countries they are banning the wearing of such veiling of physical identity when being examined by doctors and in public. It also is a threat to our citizens as Islamic Fascist Homicide Bombers are known to not only be women, but also men impersonating women have also used such head dress and loose clothing to conceal their identies (so they can't be profiled as terrorists) in addition to bulky bomb belts. I am very interested in knowing, why Ms. Douglas's objections caused The Rapid to recind its own rules? Weren't the rules originally implemented with principled reason and due consideration?
I'm very sorry to see the Rapid administration cow so easily to this type of ACLU harrasment. Are you people just begging for a homicide bomber attack. It's already been demonstrated by Islamo Fascist that they consider mass transit an excellet target for terrorist attacks. Doesn't the welfare and safety of American Citizens riding The Rapid mean more to the tranist authorities than someone who insists on wearing mideval clothing styles that predominate and are popular with our Muslim extremist enemies?
I remind you, WE ARE AT WAR SIR!!! How many more "rockets," bombs, and deaths must our cities and people suffer before everyone understands and begins to react resolutely to that fact? You people have every right to refuse ridership to people like Tasha Douglas who are so insensitive to the concerns of American Citizens riding The Rapid. I think its all upside down. Instead of everyone running around trying to pascify the "outrage" of Ms. Douglas and her supporters, everyone should be pointing how inconsiderate, disruptive, insulting, and wrong her behavior is! Wake up Rapid! Before a bomb blows you off your chairs!! Its that simple!
What the Rapid authorities fail to recognize, in my opinion, is this woman's violation of the rules of ridership are just a series of strategic probes and assaults orchestrated by Islamic Jihadists positioned here in the USA. I urge you to look more deeply into the recent news reports of the six Muslim Imams disrupting domestic airline flights out of Minnesota with their, suspicious behavior and dress. They also want the airline industry to cow to their "religon" and give them special privileges and concessions. I would point out that they are also being represented by an ACLU collaborator CAIR (Council of American Islamic Relations). They don't deserve anything more than any other passanger!!!
If any of you were to study Islamic history, you would know that the veiled woman and people like her and the Imams are part of a worldwide radical Islamic ideology that imposes their customs and self proclaimed superiority (Islamic Republic) on the cultures they invade, militarily, geographically, culturally, economically, religously, with terrorism, and any other way they can on a daliy basis. Islamic Fascists are using our juciciary, legal sophistries, and our freedoms of religion, speech, and civil rights to camoflage and advance their radical, violent, and extremist agenda against the U.S.A.
Islamo Fascist swant to lull us all into a state of domestic sleep of acceptance, and render us unawares of their real intent! They want to desensitize us to rising Jihadist Muslim Terrorist populations residing in our own communities. They want to make it routine for them to walk among us, as did the 9/11 attackers, so we don't perceive any threat or sense anything unusual. That is, until they decide to start chopping off our heads!! Wake up!!! The writing is on the wall! Support AMERICA, AMERICANS, and the AMERICAN WAY. DO NOT GIVE IN TO THE ACLU OR MUSLIM EXTREMISTS TRYING TO INTIMIDATE AMERICANS. ITS OUR CIVIL DUTY TO DO EVERY THING WE CAN TO PREVENT DOMESTIC ATTACKS ON OUR PEOPLE AND MASS TRANSIT ASSETS.
Thank you for your time Sir. In closing, I would sincerly invite you to respond to my plea for you to courageously reinstate the original rule and aggressively stand against ACLU pressure. Don't let the terror apologists, secular progressives, and liberal press intmidate, embarass, and shame you with their allegations of racisim, and discrimination against religious rights.
P.S.
I just watched a video news report, while writing you this letter, of a speech by Newt Gingrich, former speaker of the House of Representatives state, and I am paraphrasing, "…if we are at war, [and we are] those six Imams should have been arrested for impersonating a terrorist, jailed, and tried in a court of law. While, the employees of U.S. Airways should be invited to the White House and recognized for their examplery service…" I hope you will take a lesson from those brave pilots and crew of U.S. Airways. Incidentally, I also wrote U.S. Airways and praised them for their excellent judgment and for making passenger safety their top priority.
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.
| Title | By | Date |
| Have Hijabist right to impose their will in sex driven businesses in the West? [206 words] | Svet | Sep 24, 2009 13:22 |
| Islam did not come up with something new or odd. [37 words] | esraa | Jun 27, 2009 19:51 |
| ↔ don,t compare with Mother Mary or catholic nuns [151 words] | G.Vishvas | Jun 28, 2009 07:52 |
| ↔ my society [132 words] | esraa | Jun 29, 2009 07:24 |
| ↔ It is about islam as a whole and its intentions [171 words] | G.Vishvas | Jul 3, 2009 10:54 |
| Makes me furious! [67 words] | Islam setting the legal & social agenda in the west! | Feb 26, 2009 10:18 |
| birth defects [489 words] | Kiwi | Jul 4, 2008 02:13 |
| It is law already [49 words] | Gabrielle Crofts | Jun 15, 2008 02:38 |
| Cousins [17 words] | alan | Jun 9, 2008 09:04 |
| Ban it EVERYWHERE! [26 words] | Straight_Talk_Luigi | Jun 8, 2008 03:51 |
| ↔ Keeping it in the family islam style [355 words] | Gabrielle | Jun 15, 2008 06:32 |
| ↔ Muslim marriage patterns [213 words] | Straight_Talk_Luigi | Jun 16, 2008 16:25 |
| ↔ quran misunderstood [274 words] | JIBRAN SABIR QURESHI | Jun 18, 2008 02:02 |
| ↔ Science and the Qu'ran [70 words] | Straight_Talk_Luigi | Jun 19, 2008 17:03 |
| ↔ islamic is what comes from the kuran [161 words] | G.Vishvas | Jun 23, 2008 10:31 |
| ↔ reply Jibran [163 words] | Gabrielle (Australia) | Jul 11, 2008 03:41 |
| ↔ Over confidence [84 words] | JIBRAN SABIR QURESHI | Jul 12, 2008 02:41 |
| ↔ re Jibrans comment [57 words] | Gabrielle Crofts | Jul 13, 2008 23:03 |
| In our own back yard-Jihadist blogger in North carolina [274 words] | gary fouse | Jun 8, 2008 00:39 |
| ⇒ She's got a ticket to ride! [1009 words] | DeadMessenger | Dec 17, 2006 14:22 |
| ↔ Re: She's got a ticket to ride! [4 words] | Lissette | Dec 19, 2006 16:34 |
| Islam vs Christianity [52 words] | dfgsaikpdafgpkpk[ozxcvbk[xpmc B | Sep 28, 2006 23:19 |
| ↔ DUE TO THE NEW, GUTLESS, 'EFFEMINISED ENGLAND'. [147 words] | Gordon Weare | Nov 3, 2009 15:14 |
| Muslims still seeking prayer space at McGill [311 words] | Ian | Dec 6, 2005 00:12 |