Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Not necessarily Vijay
Reader comment on item: President Bush Replies to My Iraq Critique
in response to reader comment: Baathists - strategic partners

Submitted by Bob (United States), Nov 2, 2006 at 09:09

Not necessarily Vijay ... Despite the fact that the baathists are secular, we have to remember what Baathism is ... which is socialism mixed with Arab jingoism. So, if Americans are not the Great Satan, then we are evil capitalist exploiting imperialist pigs that still deserves to be dead anyways.

Speaking of another dictatorship..... I can't see Iran as being very tough militarilly, true they have weapons that they bought from the Russians but its not like the Iranians are as good as our military is in technology or in experience. The thing is, the United States, like Israel for that matter, just can't fight a propaganda war against scum that murder people while hiding under civilian cover and then cries foul when there is a retaliation. It may just be a wiser thing to take this to the battlefield where the United States is strong and then we'd have a better chance of concluding the war on terrorism in our favor aka winning... by having the records of the governments that sponsor this or by having imprisoned the officials who know of the records and then there would be all the leads that the US would need to kill them all (terrorists of course, not noncombatants).

As far as our image with these people are concerned ... if going after terrorists would make these people consider whether or not they wantto be terrorists themsemselves ......... there is no love to be lost. we'd also be able to take over their madrassas and then the U.S. would be able to make the Middle East actually full of normal people instead of religiously fanatical sociopathic megalomaniacs.

think its time to pay Saudi Arabia a little visit? ;-)

down with wahabism


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (23) on this item

Title By Date
West can defeat radical Islam [219 words]C SmithDec 31, 2006 23:31
At the command of Saudia [117 words]Yuval Brandstetter MDDec 23, 2006 14:33
The Bush Response [188 words]Mitzi AlvinNov 24, 2006 15:25
Iraq [311 words]clarence puckettDec 18, 2006 23:53
stay from view [101 words]John ManittaNov 24, 2006 12:39
Uninhabited zones? [398 words]bdoranNov 24, 2006 11:42
No Islamists in the PA before Bush? Ha. [127 words]David P.Nov 1, 2006 09:47
An immodest proposal [66 words]Peter HerzOct 30, 2006 18:26
more right [172 words]dfwhiteNov 9, 2006 17:47
Bush Is Right [499 words]John ROct 29, 2006 19:13
Baathists - strategic partners [115 words]VijayOct 28, 2006 13:14
Vijay is absolutely correct [139 words]garyOct 28, 2006 16:33
⇒ Not necessarily Vijay [289 words]BobNov 2, 2006 09:09
Rationale for continuing Iraq war [164 words]VijayOct 27, 2006 09:16
Not a great idea [275 words]garyOct 26, 2006 22:15
The writing is on the wall! [318 words]nick4693Nov 11, 2006 19:32
Bush is on the right track [68 words]Rick HouseOct 26, 2006 20:29
Base of Operations? [136 words]Kevin MOct 26, 2006 15:31
But what would terrorists do if they had oil money? [52 words]J. SummersOct 26, 2006 11:56
It's the oil...! [103 words]S JainOct 26, 2006 11:51
oil Schmoil [35 words]PatrickOct 31, 2006 15:43
Horse feathers! [139 words]BillDec 27, 2006 00:45
You are wrong Bill [151 words]Gary AndersonMar 11, 2007 23:34

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page