69 million page views

Not a great idea

Reader comment on item: President Bush Replies to My Iraq Critique

Submitted by gary (United States), Oct 26, 2006 at 22:15

Chances are the Sadrite Shia Militias backed by Iran are going to fight a protracted civil war with Baathists and Sunni factions to the death. In light of Iran's apocalyptic mahdist visions and nuclear capability, it is incumbent on the US not to allow Iran to create a client state out of Iraq.

Therefore, as politically unpalatable as it seems, the US must join forces with the remaining baathists and Sunnis (and other Islamic sunni states such as turkey and egypt) , take off the gloves and destroy all shiite forces in southern Iraq (Sadr, etc), and then drive the effort home to Tehran before they acquire a credible nuclear capability.

The gauntlet has been thrown, and the forces of civilization have NO CHOICE but to face down the forces of apocalyptic eschatology in Tehran. The US would be able to count on help from the Saudis and Egyptians. They are as afraid of radical apocalyptic shiism as we are. Shia Islam is inherentlyt radical; sunni Islam is not (with the exception of the Wahabis). Turkey is a good example of this.

I know this seems like an extreme view, but we can no more shrink from the challenge of Iran as we could from the Nazis. Iran has taken over our embassy, inspired numerous terrorists acts and sponsors hezbollah (which makes al quaeda look like boyscouts). We need to take off the gloves or the future is bleak. Mr Pipes, your proposal is a half-measure that will do nothing to stop Iran, and will potentially leave our troops as sitting ducks. We need to take the offensive here before it is too late. Thoughts?

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (23) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
West can defeat radical Islam [219 words]C SmithDec 31, 2006 23:3171281
At the command of Saudia [117 words]Yuval Brandstetter MDDec 23, 2006 14:3370343
The Bush Response [188 words]Mitzi AlvinNov 24, 2006 15:2567197
Iraq [311 words]clarence puckettDec 18, 2006 23:5367197
stay from view [101 words]John ManittaNov 24, 2006 12:3967187
Uninhabited zones? [398 words]bdoranNov 24, 2006 11:4267175
No Islamists in the PA before Bush? Ha. [127 words]David P.Nov 1, 2006 09:4764985
An immodest proposal [66 words]Peter HerzOct 30, 2006 18:2664827
more right [172 words]dfwhiteNov 9, 2006 17:4764827
Bush Is Right [499 words]John ROct 29, 2006 19:1364765
Baathists - strategic partners [115 words]VijayOct 28, 2006 13:1464682
Vijay is absolutely correct [139 words]garyOct 28, 2006 16:3364682
Not necessarily Vijay [289 words]BobNov 2, 2006 09:0964682
Rationale for continuing Iraq war [164 words]VijayOct 27, 2006 09:1664610
Not a great idea [275 words]garyOct 26, 2006 22:1564587
The writing is on the wall! [318 words]nick4693Nov 11, 2006 19:3264587
Bush is on the right track [68 words]Rick HouseOct 26, 2006 20:2964578
Base of Operations? [136 words]Kevin MOct 26, 2006 15:3164560
But what would terrorists do if they had oil money? [52 words]J. SummersOct 26, 2006 11:5664548
It's the oil...! [103 words]S JainOct 26, 2006 11:5164547
oil Schmoil [35 words]PatrickOct 31, 2006 15:4364547
Horse feathers! [139 words]BillDec 27, 2006 00:4564547
You are wrong Bill [151 words]Gary AndersonMar 11, 2007 23:3464547

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Not a great idea by gary

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)