Submitted by Robert Solot(Mexico), Jun 30, 2006 at 14:19
I agree with Dr. Pipes the this so-called recognition has to be a war aim for Israel. What I object to is this recognition be a negotiation strategy. Of course, no one requires "recognition of their right to exist", if they exist! Existence is a given in any other negotiation, with anyone, anytime--except (apparently) for the Israelis. Even less, the "implicit" recognition contained in the "Prisoners' Document". This is a transparent strategy to get Israel to make concessions, via the EU. I'm hopeful so far that the Olmert government has not responded to this, even a little bit.
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.