Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Naming the Enemy
Reader comment on item: Not Calling Islamism the Enemy

Submitted by Thomas Earl Cannady (United States), Apr 14, 2006 at 19:30

Looking at American pride in being an open society with upward mobility for law abiding citizens I wonder can we truly name or even know the enemy. Our country, and to some small degree our continent, seeks to supply those in need a place to lay their heads.

I have noticed recently that our country seems to be home to a great many people who do not have legal resident status. Adding to that point our immigration laws are being amended to allow those here illegally a method of staying and enjoying the wonderful freedoms we offer. The Clintons when in power attempted to implement a national ID system. I see we are heading toward that point but in a totally unacceptable manner. Once we offer amnesty to illegals without knowing who they are, how they got here and how much money they owe us for the bill we incurred by having them here and living illegally, will be able to say we did something good that helped those in need and made us more secure, I think not. Once we id and accept all who are here illegally (something by the way we will never be able to do since so many illegals look like us and fit into our society on a middle class level) we will have put into place a system of identifying every last person in this country.

On top of that that system will be a bonanza for the intelligence community to continue its assault on our civil rights by allowing businesses and fake citizens into the mainstream that will in fact lower our standard of living and make us less safe. We need to understand that very soon we will be offered a system of safety based on all our contacts within society. It will seem very comfortable and alluring because it will allow us to reject those we deem to be dangerous to the many. There are two many secret courts, here today and gone tomorrow military units, intelligence agencies that use the black budget to redo the very fabric of society. It will start with a system of identifying terrorist but it will end with the total and systematic destruction of our civil rights so those in power can sleep at night knowing everything that happens while they sleep will be watched, recorded and controlled.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (36) on this item

Title By Date
Media uses Radical Islamist, not terrorist, to describe a front for Al Qaida.- Halleluia!!! [108 words]SvetlanatchkahApr 14, 2009 02:20
The great Saladin [116 words]Jonathan WilliamsMar 27, 2009 13:54
The myth of "moderate muslims" and "moderate islam". [489 words]The Final CrusadeDec 14, 2008 21:30
Muhamad Ali Is A Terrorist [89 words]MycosMar 13, 2009 00:27
RELIGION & CIVILISATION [46 words]agoghèDec 12, 2008 08:25
concerned American [208 words]Concerned AmericanDec 10, 2008 10:57
No such thing as moderate Islam [57 words]MalDec 9, 2008 15:34
The US State Department Is Chickening [69 words]YnnatchkahFeb 8, 2008 13:16
Muslims SHOULD be offended...by what their fellow Muslims believe and do [281 words]DrRJPNov 29, 2006 19:07
Might want to add yet another name to the list... [33 words]J.S.Nov 28, 2006 18:19
Babylon the Great [145 words]Mark HarrisNov 28, 2006 15:32
Muslims fight terror [133 words]Abdul Rahman ReijerinkMay 26, 2006 10:50
muslims fight terrorist who use islam as a way to kill the innocent. [94 words]ahmad zafireDec 1, 2006 16:55
Naming and identifying the enemy [203 words]ChrisrinaMay 6, 2006 18:37
Very amusing [201 words]Richard BeecherApr 17, 2006 16:30
The EU Fantasyland [259 words]Roy WeinbergApr 16, 2006 18:51
Please correct those comments about me. [303 words]Mujahid El MasihJun 27, 2009 00:34
Calling the enemy by its real name [287 words]Ed GordonApr 16, 2006 03:54
Western Governments Still Avoid Naming the Enemy [473 words]steven LApr 15, 2006 16:04
Magog Rising [213 words]Robert LangfelderApr 14, 2006 22:11
money, demographics, political correctness and globalism [184 words]Arnold FishmanApr 14, 2006 22:05
Fear of Islam and Moslim [217 words]F. ShakkiApr 14, 2006 21:59
Political correctness [45 words]albert BostwickApr 14, 2006 21:07
The Pink Elephant in the Room [71 words]Cap'n CanadaApr 14, 2006 21:06
⇒ Naming the Enemy [394 words]Thomas Earl CannadyApr 14, 2006 19:30
about islam [32 words]grainne fullbrookApr 14, 2006 16:08
Islamism = Terrorism [198 words]ToTelltheTruthApr 14, 2006 14:44
Naming the type of conflict we're in. Dr Pipes on 14 4 2006 [238 words]Ian MApr 14, 2006 12:18
Not Until [18 words]Dr. Lee D. CaryApr 14, 2006 11:07
Rhetorics are a double edged sword [481 words]Farid H.Apr 13, 2006 20:19
no kidding [84 words]JihadiApr 13, 2006 13:39
Don't worry Jesus will come soon to tell who is terrorist, rascist, fascist, racit and who is not! [412 words]Iraqi BoyApr 14, 2006 03:35
Frustrated People [88 words]Iraqi BoyApr 16, 2006 13:26
islam is the enemy [139 words]G.BisvasApr 13, 2006 13:35
Never ended process! [187 words]Muhammad_Jesus_Moses_AdamApr 14, 2006 03:57
Everything is linked with Economic interest [134 words]Iraqi BoyApr 13, 2006 10:21

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page