5 readers online now  |  69 million page views

ISIS won't self-destruct for a long time

Reader comment on item: ISIS' Imminent Demise

Submitted by Stephen (Canada), Dec 6, 2015 at 15:02

The problem is that ISIS kills off anyone who deviates from its central theme or challenges the leadership, They have decided that their leader is the caliph and that is it. Ergo, its structure does not allow it to self-destruct internally. Even if there is an overthrow, the new caliph would be followed, giving religious reasons for the overthrow, such as the previous caliph wasn't as devote as he should have been.

The Russians have done more damage to ISIS in four months than the US "lead" collation. Why hadn't Obama sanctioned the bombing of the oil trucks and oil wells, which supplies ISIS with funding (and via Turkey, which deals with ISIS oil)? The press has been acting as though the oil field bombing was a stroke of genius, though this is what is usually one of the first targets in a war.

When ISIS was a truck column of 800 mwn, Obama didn't bomb them. When it was a procession of 8500 men, and everyone knew what it was up to, all Obama had to do was send in the Warthog attack planes and decimate ISIS in twenty minutes. We have seen how effective these planes are on ground forces. But no. He held back.

Most bombing missions have been sent out without dropping bombs. A big US run was six sorties a day with maybe dropping bombs once or twice, if at all. Now its suddenly a big thing to actually bomb, but as just announced today, the US is almost out of bombs. It will take four years to replenish its stock. Nice telling ISIS and the Russians (and Chinese) about how crippled the US bombing capacity is. So much for cutting military spending. Smart man that Obama. It also brings to mind that if planes return so often with their bombs, how few did the US have to start with?

The Russians aren't shy. They bomb. They attack. They kill and they are not worried about who is the target. Your home is near the ISIS headquarters, too bad for you. And that is how all wars have been won. But the West now has to be politically correct and it would be wrong to go full out.

The new Canadian PM, Trudeau The Unwise, stated that we should give warm clothes and tell Syrians how to keep warm in winter rather than use CF-18a fighter bombers. He will be recalling the planes ASAP. He is typical. France just woke up. GB is waking up and heading off ISIS from attacking at home– now. Finally. Too late. After multiple attacks on GB and France, ISIS knows there are no limits to what it can do. No real conviction to fight ISIS and win. Only to restrict.

There are dozens of other terrorist Muslim groups around the world, all part of the same machine. Until our so-called leaders actually realise that we are well into a state of international war, nothing effective will be done. Its war, just as it was 1200 years ago when Islam attacked Europe. It took a Romanian prince, "Vlad the Impairer", to finally turn the tide, by being as brutal as the Muslims, who had a habit of decapitating caputred defenders.

The Koran is a simple how to book on world domination. Just the West is too stupid to admit or acknowledge it, Just too Politically Correct. Instead of reducing our military (the Trudeau and Obama plan), and surrendering internal decisions of defence and offence to the UN, we should be putting funding into our militaries, reducing gun restrictions (while increasing required gun education before ownership) and tightening the borders against a socio-religious philosophy that means us harm no matter how the PC want to dress it up.

Until the West decides to actually commit itself to all out bombing (to begin with), not much will improve. ISIS just laughs at us.

Also, the West should not be taking sides in Syria. The "rebels" are no better than the government, and visa-versa. Giving the rebels weapons only gives them weapons that end up being used on the West. Now Russia is supporting Syria's government, so eventually it will be Russia fighting the West. Oh joy.

So I disagree with Mr. Pipes. ISIS will not self-destruct soon. Unless it is brutally suppressed and destroyed, it will be around for a long, long time. And PC idiots like Trudeau and Obama around doesn't help.

Japan has a simple policy for Muslim immigrants: conform or don't come. Time we all ended "multiculturalism" and adopted Japan's policy.

Once Quebec's Bill 59 passes, I can be arrested for writing this. I'm certain Baby Trudeau will come up with a similar law federally.
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (47) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
ISIS, ¿Imminent Demise? [233 words]Guillermo TruebaJan 15, 2016 13:16227675
The recognition of ISIS and its Caliphate [55 words]DavodDec 30, 2015 11:08227368
Not quite [133 words]Yehuda PochDec 15, 2015 08:56227074
Fire and Wood [551 words]Michael SDec 24, 2015 06:18227074
An inaccurate statement [27 words]GeppettoDec 13, 2015 15:35227032
Islam and the world [60 words]arish sahaniDec 12, 2015 11:47226994
Must the West attack ISIS in Syria? [305 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
mythDec 12, 2015 05:35226964
ISIS in not self destructive [178 words]Curtis FreedlandDec 11, 2015 00:58226915
THE END OF ISIS [130 words]SANDRO LOEWEDec 10, 2015 14:47226907
let the US military offer ISIS a compromise [139 words]mythDec 8, 2015 19:45226888
some additional considerations [240 words]Arthur Pitz, Ph.D.Dec 8, 2015 12:58226878
Dabiq [83 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Elisha benAbuyaDec 8, 2015 12:22226877
Dabiq [33 words]Elisha benAbuyaDec 12, 2015 09:58226877
Paris and Sinai [191 words]AlexDec 8, 2015 12:09226875
1Forget about ISIS [74 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
François GravelDec 8, 2015 07:14226869
1ISIS cannot be squashed [605 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Michael SDec 8, 2015 02:58226858
I'm glad we agree; but "crushing" is easier said, than done [287 words]Michael SDec 12, 2015 07:13226858
1ISIS or its clones will take long time before they disappear [252 words]PrashantDec 7, 2015 22:34226855
Now you see me, Now you don't [388 words]P. PiperDec 9, 2015 16:24226855
Prashant, I agree with you entirely! [6 words]Michael SDec 10, 2015 15:29226855
Limited Light at the End of the Daish Tunnel [234 words]M ToveyDec 7, 2015 15:33226852
Squishy bugs. Oh my! [351 words]Michael SDec 10, 2015 17:35226852
Ezekiel 28:12 et sequiter [24 words]M ToveyDec 14, 2015 10:31226852
Things to come [313 words]Michael SDec 17, 2015 10:14226852
Regarding predictable predictions vis-à-vis Erdogan [115 words]FrankzDec 7, 2015 14:28226850
2The end of Daish [66 words]dhimmi no moreDec 7, 2015 13:32226849
1That may be.... [56 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Ib1netmonDec 7, 2015 12:43226848
1ISIS/ISIL/DAESH Are NOT easy to defeat [59 words]Brian O' ReillyDec 7, 2015 09:05226846
1ISIS's strength [244 words]AnonDec 7, 2015 01:36226842
No signs of ISIS demise on the horizon yet! [24 words]JaladhiDec 6, 2015 19:53226838
1a poisonous rose by many other names [249 words]Charles MartelDec 6, 2015 17:46226836
ISIS [2 words]BorisDec 8, 2015 14:28226836
2ISIS won't self-destruct for a long time [786 words]StephenDec 6, 2015 15:02226832
ISIS [1 words]BorDec 8, 2015 14:34226832
ISIS' Imminent Demise? Even if they now have WMD? [1 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
jmwtcllcDec 6, 2015 12:34226830
Yes. Exactly. [37 words]Doug MayfieldDec 6, 2015 11:39226828
'small bug'...like Xenopsylla cheopis? [354 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
PaulDec 6, 2015 10:54226827
Learn From ISIS [267 words]DaveDec 6, 2015 10:17226826
Are you calling them "JV League"? [87 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Haim ModianoDec 6, 2015 09:31226825
The Real Threat [167 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
BillDec 6, 2015 09:24226824
Agree with Dr Pipes but... [71 words]AnonDec 8, 2015 15:51226824
Unwinding Radical Islam [100 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Solomon BalasDec 6, 2015 08:02226822
Wahhabism and oil, a toxic mix [57 words]Colin RoseDec 6, 2015 04:32226817
1ISIS' Imminent Demise [96 words]Avinoam Ben DorDec 6, 2015 01:28226815
The real threat. [7 words]steven LDec 5, 2015 23:22226814
ISIS [28 words]Janusz KowalikDec 5, 2015 22:44226813
1Wouldn't ground troops need to be deployed indefinitely? [89 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Anon.Dec 5, 2015 17:24226812

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to ISIS won't self-destruct for a long time by Stephen

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

ADVERTISEMENTS

eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2019 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)