Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Who Wouldn't
Reader comment on item: Pro-Israel Palestinians

Submitted by Arlinda DeAngelis (United States), May 15, 2005 at 11:00

This is not rocket science for the Arabs in Palestine. Israel has a stable democratic government and all that it implies. Israelis have basic personal rights and vote for their representatives and leaders. Israel has institutions. Their young people have schools in which to be educated. Israel has hospitals and doctors that care for the sick and dying. It has cultural institutions and an economy that creates jobs and encourages prosperity. Israelis have a stable society.

What does the "Authority" in Palestine offer. It offers its people the right to kill themselves and as many Israelis as is humanly possible. It offers no personal rights and who knows where real leadership begins. Is it Hamas, Hezebollah, Al Aqusa, the Martyr's Brigade ... who? It has no economy except payoffs for terrorism. It offers no education other than camps training its camper students on how to become a homicide suicide bomber. It has no jobs. It has no economy. It has no imports except of course rockets and guns and bombs. It has no exports, except, of course, terrorism. A stable society among the Arabs in Palestine is defined by how many children can be produced to become homicide suicide bombers. The mothers in these stable families happily accept payment for the deaths of their children ... the very definition of a stable society!!!!

What person in their right mind would consider that the "Authority" in Palestine offers a better more secure more prosperous longer life than Israel?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (21) on this item

Title By Date
Kudos [74 words]SamMar 29, 2008 18:01
of course the historian know.. [54 words]lance lancarDec 5, 2007 22:27
I Appreciate the Column [51 words]Sara CannonMay 30, 2005 19:03
re: comment by Leonard, "My little bungalow" [57 words]DavidMay 18, 2005 18:54
⇒ Who Wouldn't [245 words]Arlinda DeAngelisMay 15, 2005 11:00
Why isn't this in our daily newspapers? [17 words]Joyena AbrahamMay 14, 2005 23:18
History repeating itself once again [134 words]garyMay 12, 2005 13:56
My little bungalow [174 words]LeonardMay 11, 2005 23:54
Are you kidding, Mr. Pipes?! [137 words]RomanMay 11, 2005 15:44
Lets roll [94 words]ethan jacobyAug 4, 2006 19:32
Comfort Level... [92 words]MichaelMay 11, 2005 13:33
Mirror function of Israel [278 words]WernerMay 11, 2005 10:19
Freedom is the fundamental political reqirement for humans [159 words]Ralph C. Whaley MDMay 11, 2005 09:54
Moderate Muslims [120 words]Dr. Richard BenkinMay 11, 2005 06:39
Hardly a Majority [52 words]Jacob CarmielMay 11, 2005 05:54
Defamation of Character [14 words]JohnMay 10, 2005 19:26
The Silent Majority (?) [72 words]PatMay 10, 2005 11:15
Comfort Level of Arabs in the Disputed Terrorities and in Israel [105 words]Sheldon SeltzerMay 10, 2005 11:02
Palestinian Arabs [38 words]Donald W. BalesMay 10, 2005 10:41
Palestinian rights [263 words]Octavio JohansonMay 10, 2005 10:23
The Anti Human 'Palestinian' Arabs use of 'Human rights' organizations - The 'Human rights propaganda' [3128 words]AlApr 5, 2009 12:37

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page