Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Mirror function of Israel
Reader comment on item: Pro-Israel Palestinians

Submitted by Werner (United States), May 11, 2005 at 10:19

Israel as the western fortress in the arab world has a mirror function for Arabs and Palestinians in particular. They look over the border and then compare their own daily lives with those of Israelis.

When Arabs see in this mirror it is very painful for them. What they see is a thriving country, scientifically advanced, modern technologies, wealth, educated and productive people, a society based on human rights, a people which plans, acts and thinks.

The Arabs got their first wake up call with the defeat by Napoleon's armies. By that event they knew they are backwards, disorganized, fragmented, lacking in technology, lacking admitting the truth and finding the truth, favoring emotions over rationalism, are restrained in their development by a backward adaptation of religion and so on.

Arabs know to what level they have to develop (if only it is for the sake of defeating Israel) but the question is do they develop?

The USA confronts Arabs' backwardness even more. Iraq (I know it is not completely Arab) will be a state with a strongly influenced western culture. That is going to be a bigger mirror to the Arab nations, and which is already influencing the neighboring countries.

As a reaction to seeing themselves, they try to destroy the mirror. They can't stand to see their mistakes. Smarter ones learn from their enemies. Hopefully this learning will also diminish the hate they feel.

Napoleon defeated the Arabs 200 years ago, the French colonized Tunis, Algiers and Morocco, the Brits the Ottoman empire, but did that really change the arab mentality? I doubt that, at least it is a very very slow process.

Let's see whether the USA and Israel can do better.

Greetings

Werner

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (21) on this item

Title By Date
Kudos [74 words]SamMar 29, 2008 18:01
of course the historian know.. [54 words]lance lancarDec 5, 2007 22:27
I Appreciate the Column [51 words]Sara CannonMay 30, 2005 19:03
re: comment by Leonard, "My little bungalow" [57 words]DavidMay 18, 2005 18:54
Who Wouldn't [245 words]Arlinda DeAngelisMay 15, 2005 11:00
Why isn't this in our daily newspapers? [17 words]Joyena AbrahamMay 14, 2005 23:18
History repeating itself once again [134 words]garyMay 12, 2005 13:56
My little bungalow [174 words]LeonardMay 11, 2005 23:54
Are you kidding, Mr. Pipes?! [137 words]RomanMay 11, 2005 15:44
Lets roll [94 words]ethan jacobyAug 4, 2006 19:32
Comfort Level... [92 words]MichaelMay 11, 2005 13:33
⇒ Mirror function of Israel [278 words]WernerMay 11, 2005 10:19
Freedom is the fundamental political reqirement for humans [159 words]Ralph C. Whaley MDMay 11, 2005 09:54
Moderate Muslims [120 words]Dr. Richard BenkinMay 11, 2005 06:39
Hardly a Majority [52 words]Jacob CarmielMay 11, 2005 05:54
Defamation of Character [14 words]JohnMay 10, 2005 19:26
The Silent Majority (?) [72 words]PatMay 10, 2005 11:15
Comfort Level of Arabs in the Disputed Terrorities and in Israel [105 words]Sheldon SeltzerMay 10, 2005 11:02
Palestinian Arabs [38 words]Donald W. BalesMay 10, 2005 10:41
Palestinian rights [263 words]Octavio JohansonMay 10, 2005 10:23
The Anti Human 'Palestinian' Arabs use of 'Human rights' organizations - The 'Human rights propaganda' [3128 words]AlApr 5, 2009 12:37

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page