69 million page views

You blame Bush for the wrong mistake--response

Reader comment on item: ISIS Rampages, the Middle East Shakes
in response to reader comment: You blame Bush for the wrong mistake

Submitted by James Strom (United States), Jun 25, 2014 at 22:09

Well, thanks for that challenge. Since you are a scholar of the area, and that is in fact why I read your blog, you would have high quality sources of information at hand, while I was working from my recollection of the era in question. But I have managed to come up with a few things that are relevant.

My first paragraph refers to Bush's attitude to the status of forces agreement (SOFA) but implicitly also to Bush's conviction that the war on terror would last over an extended time. The latter point should not be too controversial, since it was widely discussed during the early Bush administration. Here is an op-ed from Tom Hayden denouncing the idea of a "long war" lasting for several generations.

http://articles.latimes.com/2010/mar/28/opinion/la-oe-hayden28-2010mar28

I suspect that the "long war" idiom came out of the defense department, but I am pretty sure that Bush himself used the term once or twice. This is worth making explicit, because if Bush saw the US as involved in managing affairs in the Middle East for an extended period, it is quite likely that an extended stay in Iraq would be compatible with his overall idea.

Next, I have hit upon an investigation by the WaPo's fact checker, Glenn Kessler. Admittedly, this is recent, but it looks at recollections regarding the SOFA negotiations.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/wp/2014/01/13/the-mccain-graham-claim-iraqs-main-political-blocs-were-supportive-of-keeping-u-s-troops-in-iraq/

This is a discussion of a claim by Senator McCain that Obama could and should have concluded a status of forces agreement with Iraq at the conclusion of the previous agreement. Both sides appeared to lean toward accepting a presence of US troops for training and possibly logistics. Agreement could not be reached due to the political postures taken on all sides. In particular, Obama required approval by the Iraqi parliament, while Maliki was willing only to make an informal commitment.

Glenn Kessler, writes:

"The Bush administration signed a SOFA with Iraq in 2008 that established a deadline for the withdrawal of all U.S. forces from Iraq by Dec. 31, 2011. But there was some expectation that the SOFA could be renewed after that, with at least a small U.S. force remaining."

James Jeffrey, former ambassador to Iraq, is quoted as saying that everyone in the Obama administration (probably mostly the military) agreed that a US force of about 5,000 should be kept for training purposes.

Finally, I have Hugh Hewitt's recent interview with former VP Cheney:

http://www.hughhewitt.com/vice-president-collapse-obama-foreign-policy/

There's quite a bit included, but at one point Cheney says,

"And while certainly, you know, the Iraq operation was a tough one, it went on longer than we thought it would, but in the final analysis, what was left for the Obama administration to do was to get that SOFA agreement, that status of forces agreement, and leave behind enough of a U.S. force so that we could help the Iraqis help themselves, and maintain their sovereign territory and develop and operate a respectable security force."

Cheney clearly speaks as though he understood that Bush had left Obama with the task of getting some kind of renewal of the agreement. Hewett also offers quotes from Hillary Clinton and Obama to the effect that they did offer to make an extension of the SOFA, again generally in keeping with the expectation that Cheney had expressed.

Now, Obama did not get that agreement, as I said, because he insisted on formal parliamentary approval, which was not attainable. Cynics have suggested that Obama set his condition in the negotiation to deliberately torpedo the agreement, but I have no opinion on that.

So, have I proved that Bush expected, or hoped for, a continuation of American military presence in Iraq? In your position, I would say no, because the sources are rather weak, although Cheney is not, and why would I want to make such an admission anyway! But for my purposes I believe I've established that it is quite plausible that Bush thought that continued American support was called for (and events have proved this right). And continued presence is and was consistent with his long term hopes for the region.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Daniel Pipes replies:

"Long war" always referred to the fight against Islamist violence, not the war in Iraq

I acknowledge that Bush might have expected his successor to change the terms of the SOFA but I do not recall from then nor see in your research here anything that specifically points to that.

In any case, it makes little sense to me that Bush would sign for complete withdrawal of US troops and expect that later to be undone.

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (88) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
2Our president and the crusades! Amazing and silly remarks [179 words]dhimmi no moreFeb 6, 2015 11:54220907
1Here is the other reason why the Da'ish terrorists murdered Moaz al-Kasabeh and it is Q9:14 [124 words]dhimmi no moreFeb 6, 2015 10:38220906
1The reason why the Da'ish terrorists murdered Moaz Kasabeh the Jordanian pilot! And is it straight from the Qur'an [101 words]dhimmi no moreFeb 3, 2015 13:43220850
1احكام التحريق بالنار or rules for burning with fire straight from the Wahhabi Um al-Qurra University in SA [95 words]dhimmi no moreFeb 4, 2015 09:47220850
Middle East Solution [32 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Kirby HopperJan 12, 2015 13:02220309
4Even al-Jazeera admits that Yazidi women are being sold as slaves and are being raped! And where is the useful idiot Ben Affleck? [108 words]dhimmi no moreOct 14, 2014 09:50218707
1Al-Jazeera admits that they removed their despicable article posted on their Arabic web site"Were Foley and Sotlof beheaded?" [96 words]dhimmi no moreSep 7, 2014 11:50217639
2Al-Jazeera and "Were Foley and Sotlof really beheaded?" [122 words]dhimmi no moreSep 7, 2014 08:37217636
1Iran and the US vs ISIS? [134 words]dhimmi no moreSep 5, 2014 09:05217616
2Abdel Majed Abdel Bary and the British should not be allowed to enter the US without getting visitor visas until they clean up their act [161 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
dhimmi no moreAug 24, 2014 16:57217373
1The list of suspects in the murder of James Foley [98 words]dhimmi no moreAug 25, 2014 09:21217373
Change their name [34 words]MuurayAug 26, 2014 00:15217373
2Victims of the Arabs and Islamic imperialism [198 words]dhimmi no moreAug 31, 2014 16:26217373
mother of killer [36 words]sarahSep 3, 2014 02:02217373
1That is the right expression, Know Islam [20 words]Ravi Ranjan SinghSep 14, 2014 01:51217373
1الحسبة The new ISIS twist on the old Saudi religious police [231 words]dhimmi no moreAug 17, 2014 17:51217210
1The Saudis are using Egyptians and Pakistanis in order to defend their border with Iraq [49 words]dhimmi no moreAug 4, 2014 20:49216519
3We are all Ezidi/Yazidi [181 words]dhimmi no moreAug 4, 2014 08:17216513
2Very sad video and a call for help from a Yazidi women who is a member of the Iraqi Parliament I urge all readers to watch this video [117 words]dhimmi no moreAug 8, 2014 07:43216513
2Helpline for Yazidis and other oppressed of Iraq [803 words]Ravi Ranjan SinghAug 31, 2014 03:29216513
How to help Yazidis? [288 words]C DubeNov 13, 2014 17:33216513
1FMG is now mandated in the Islamic Caliphate aka IS [487 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
dhimmi no moreJul 24, 2014 11:34216328
Thank you for the constant updates [96 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
MalcolmJul 22, 2014 08:21216281
1el-Baghdadi wears a very expensive watch made by kuffar and it is a R*lex! What a disaster [34 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
dhimmi no moreJul 6, 2014 17:31215830
Arab "Political" "Ummah" & Caliphate in the 21st Century [175 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
LudvikusJul 6, 2014 10:18215823
ISIS destroys Islamic Heritage :: The world is silent! [30 words]Harry OrensteinJul 5, 2014 16:56215793
ISIS's Context: Pan-Arabism and Ba'thism [204 words]LudvikusJun 30, 2014 09:37215667
Civilized Islamist Civilty [79 words]LudvikusJun 27, 2014 09:11215617
Secterianism vs.Nationalism & Religius Reformation in the Middle East [239 words]LudvikusJun 25, 2014 10:32215596
PRESIDENT OBAMA SAYS NO AMOUNT OF U.S. MILITARY POWER CAN HOLD IRAQ TOGETHER [132 words]Ameer Labeeb HassanJun 25, 2014 01:36215593
PRESIDENT OBAMA SAYS NO AMOUNT OF U.S. MILITARY POWER CAN HOLD IRAQ TOGETHER [132 words]Ameer Labeeb HassanJun 23, 2014 15:29215566
What is is [pun intended] - the dream of Palestine Arabs to drive the Jews into the Mediterranean Sea. [187 words]LudvikusJun 22, 2014 15:00215556
3More alarming news from the ME and the solution to the problem of street children in Egypt? The author suggests that they be killed! [92 words]dhimmi no moreJun 20, 2014 08:33215524
3Terrorists are not very smart [60 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
dhimmi no moreJun 19, 2014 08:22215506
2Ikhwaneb calls ISIS atrocities in Iraq a "revolt for freedom" ! Alhamdullilah [51 words]dhimmi no moreJun 19, 2014 07:40215505
4Time is ripe for re-mapping [61 words]Michael Hanni MorcosJun 18, 2014 11:44215475
More Lines on a Map of Serious Consequences [399 words]M. ToveyJun 23, 2014 18:35215475
More Lines on a Map of Serious Consequences (continued) [25 words]M. ToveyJun 30, 2014 18:14215475
Modern Day Vandals [73 words]DaveJun 17, 2014 21:39215454
1Frogs and angels [309 words]UgriJun 17, 2014 08:10215443
Table [5 words]anti3antiJun 17, 2014 02:49215438
1Iraq Stickler: Oil [142 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
DaveJun 16, 2014 21:54215432
Sunni-Shia sectarian war [67 words]saraJun 16, 2014 21:04215430
You blame Bush for the wrong mistake [293 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
James StromJun 16, 2014 19:03215429
You blame Bush for the wrong mistake--response [680 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
James StromJun 25, 2014 22:09215429
world entanglement with ME [68 words]AlbertoJun 16, 2014 05:19215423
Middle East Crisis. [264 words]EmanuelJun 16, 2014 01:54215420
Around again [47 words]Ramon MachteshJun 15, 2014 15:29215414
Israel [73 words]y Brandstetter MDJun 15, 2014 05:07215408
1How sad Saddam is gone [214 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Jacques HadidaJun 15, 2014 01:59215407
execution of Osama bin Laden [48 words]FrankzJun 14, 2014 23:41215405
Muslims love/hate "Islamism" relationship [275 words]FrankzJun 14, 2014 23:21215404
The future of Iraq [335 words]Sigmund DermanJun 14, 2014 22:03215403
1ISIS Threatens Slaughter Of King Abdullah Of Jordan [197 words]Lujack SkylarkJun 14, 2014 20:30215401
Agree with this article's conclusion [179 words]Michael BennettJun 14, 2014 19:50215400
Muslims hate Islamism [8 words]SteveJun 14, 2014 16:07215397
western interest in ME [40 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
WarrenJun 14, 2014 10:42215392
Syria-Iraq & Greater Kurdistant - New State & Homes for Palestinian "Refugees" [219 words]LudvikusJun 14, 2014 09:33215389
Obama let off too lightly [157 words]MalcolmJun 14, 2014 09:28215388
finding it eerie [74 words]Tom SlatteryJun 14, 2014 00:32215381
ISIS-The reason for 8000 US drones..... [51 words]Tony SantoraJun 13, 2014 19:32215379
Islam's Appointment in Samarra [368 words]Pied PiperJun 13, 2014 19:05215378
1A poisoned rose by any other name [54 words]Jose GreckoJun 13, 2014 17:14215377
2Picture of the Amir of ISIS and he ain't pretty [52 words]dhimmi no moreJun 13, 2014 17:08215376
re: ISIS Rampages, the Middle East Shakes [193 words]trawnaJun 13, 2014 16:31215375
The Nuclear option, prayer, hope and change [428 words]YusufJun 13, 2014 13:32215370
Truman ended WWII w/ Japan in six weeks w/ the nuclear option [82 words]LouisAug 22, 2014 16:50215370
Tehran vs. Ankara * Sisi vs, ISIS [358 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
LudvikusJun 13, 2014 12:34215368
Bismarck missed an opportunity [112 words]mythJun 17, 2014 07:11215368
Bismarck - Judging 19th-Century Europe by 21-Century Standards [387 words]LudvikusJun 18, 2014 09:04215368
opportunity to ditch Saudia Arabia and embrace the Kurds [27 words]mythJun 13, 2014 11:21215366
1Dec 8th vs Sept 12th [272 words]Ron ThompsonJun 13, 2014 11:01215365
1Syria - Frankfurt - France -Bruxelles [71 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
mythJun 13, 2014 11:00215364
the West to protect itself [84 words]mythJun 17, 2014 07:43215364
two fairy tales of grievances [69 words]mythJun 13, 2014 10:54215363
1These are the barbarians in Iraq and they are the members of ISIS! [53 words]dhimmi no moreJun 13, 2014 09:29215361
Civil war brewing between sunni, shia Islam? [44 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
AnneMJun 13, 2014 08:45215360
2Turkey should be ready [167 words]dhimmi no moreJun 13, 2014 07:49215359
Regarding the article "ISIS Rampages, the Middle East Shakes" of June 12, 2014 [40 words]Gary NewmanJun 13, 2014 04:45215357
Alqaeda vs. ISIS [32 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
AlexJun 13, 2014 00:54215355
Predictions and Biblical archetypes [529 words]YosefJun 12, 2014 22:56215352
We lost 5,000 soldiers in Iraq was for NOTHING! [5 words]NuritGJun 12, 2014 22:33215351
ISIS and the pro-jihadist president [157 words]M.D. AnthonyJun 12, 2014 22:24215350
Protecting Own Interests: Tough Lessons Learned [146 words]Mike RamirezJun 12, 2014 22:12215349
Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn. [118 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
SunshineJun 12, 2014 21:13215348
1ISIS Rampages, the Middle East Shakes [187 words]JudithJun 12, 2014 21:05215347
Iran vs. Isis [29 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
AnonJun 12, 2014 21:02215346
Of Course [161 words]Mark WerfelJun 12, 2014 20:30215345

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)